So this isn't really intended to be a subchost or anything, I don't think. I hope?
But I think we've probably mostly seen a lot of the "X... but this is a small site with only a few staff" chosts, and @jkap's post about it, and I dunno
I'm an elder millennial and I've been around the internet a long-ass time. I remember before The Times Before Great Aggregation, when every site was taken over by exactly three colossal tech giants with billions in funding, and the internet became a lot smaller.
Sites were jank as fuck back then. A lot of stuff was inconvenient or didn't work or was running on some outdated version of something. By comparison, this site is infinitely better and can/has responded better to UX demands put on it by a growing user base with diverging needs.
I just kind of wonder if somewhere, we lost some context, and we've been living in a small, corporatized garden of sites for so long that it's easy to lose sight/patience with how a site develops itself outside of that context? Even if we probably intuitively know that in spite of limited resources and time, it's likely ultimately better able to respond to the needs of its users in the long run - otherwise we wouldn't seriously be making these kinds of requests.

