anneandrogen

Bitch of the Year 1997

Find me at Anneandrogen on Itch.io, Tumblr, and Dreamwidth


anneandrogen
@anneandrogen

Writing fantasy about trans characters has me thinking about how we use language in genre work, especially anything set in a nebulous "past." As much as I love genrebabble, it would just feel kind of disingenuous to have to substitute every nuanced piece of trans language for a wholly made up word (or worse, moving the transness to the layer of metaphor entirely). Not to even mention how much having to make up words for and then explain how, for example, a character would say transsexual instead of transgender would balloon my word count just to be legible, even to trans readers.

So I use modern language around transness, which means I end up using modern language for a lot more. It reads smoother and is far less stop-and-start in the reading process but still, it sits in the back of my mind. How much is fantasy trying to sound like fantasy when its characters talk? How much of this just comes from age, when a lot of books written decades ago might sound out of date because they just are, even if they weren't when originally published.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @anneandrogen's post:

For real, if I want to discuss or include something in my writings that also exists in the real world, I'm just gonna have that thing in my writings. Why talk about Orc racism when I can just have actual racism discussions? Why have made up weird euphemisms for queer people when I can just have queer people?

I might include fantastical elements to these real life concepts, like how in my sci-fi setting trans people can literally just get a new body in like 3 months by growing one that's exactly the way they want instead of having to deal with HRT, surgeries (for those who want them), and the gradual changes that may not end up working out the way you want; they're still trans though, they're still the same trans people as we have in the real world.

Just don't be cowards, talk about the issues directly instead of skirting around them, or equating fake equivalents to the real world issues.