Everything got better when I became a green-haired 2D girl. I do fun and unusual things with video games and pinball.

cohost inspired me to do more. Thank you



adrienne
@adrienne

(well, "interesting" if you're a weird nerd, a data scientist, or an astronomer, but i suspect that most people who pay any attention to me are at least one of those three):

  • no leap seconds between 2035-2135
  • four new unit prefixes for Really Big (ronna, quetta) and Really Small (ronto, quecto) values!

In honor of this, i would like to request that someone create art of a quectoEggBug.


arborelia
@arborelia

this is the most amazing news that doesn't matter except to programmers! we've almost abolished leap seconds!

they'll be dead in 2035, and by 2135, nobody will remember what they were for (because they are not for anything) or how a standards organization concern-trolled themselves into implementing them in 1972

UTC timestamps will become monotonic just in time for a bunch of computers to accidentally subtract 2^32 from them for a different reason


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @adrienne's post:

in reply to @arborelia's post:

okay but why would this happen. why would the IERS, knowing that nobody wants leap seconds and we're about to formally get rid of them, do a negative leap second for the first and possibly only time, when they could instead just not

One consequence here is that we lose the primary distinction between UTC (which has/had leap seconds) and TAI (which does not have leap seconds) and so now they're just gonna permanently be weirdly 37 seconds off from each other.