Loosf
@Loosf

Posting about posting.

It really is the Linux of twitters, and that person seemed to be completely unable to understand that the "overwhelm with options" approach they were going with trying to evangelize to June was just entirely counter productive.

Friction. Friction to the desired experience.
Yeah yeah yeah all that ink spilled on "experiences dumbed down" and turning users from users into mere consumers, content, dumbing down experiences
But that is the thing. Not everyone wants or can be a power user. Not everyone wants to build or configure EVERYTHING.

IT COULD HAVE BEEN EASY to say "ok what kinda posting do you want" and
just point to the appropriate instance for shit
not "you have all these optionsssss"
if you want to evangelize about something to someone
you have to think as a fucking casual user
"what is your need"
not "you have all these tools, figure it out yourself"


bobskunk
@bobskunk

also the sheer load of "you are an idiot and a jerk for not understanding something as simple as the fediverse and you ignorant sheep nazis deserve to die alone along with twitter"

at any moment they're about to start john galt monologuing on their mastodon account that nobody follows because it's literally nothing but metagrievanceposting and they genuinely think that they didn't alienate anyone, everyone alienated them

plus it's just a bad experience. socially and technically it's alllll friction


artie-codecrafter
@artie-codecrafter

Is that nowhere else, outside the realm of "tech", things are expected to be "frictionless". There's learning curve to everything, from baking a pie to picking up a musical instrument. Or, alternatively, there are people who do it for you, and whom you pay.
And yet the moment there's "friction" in tech, people start throwing feces around yelling "how dare you".
And yeah, it might "alienate the common user" but whatever I guess. I made my peace with it. Can't make a horse drink and all that.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @Loosf's post:

pointing to an instance that might work for the poster's needs rather than "oh that software that instance runs on sucks here are all the other alternatives in infrastructure that I prefer" for starters.

Why would THAT particular user be interested in the software that is running the instance? Why should someone care?
It is literally stallmanning "it is not linux, it is gnu/linux" going into detail that that end user has no fucking interest whatsoever.

Via does not see june's use case.

in reply to @bobskunk's post:

honestly, this place isn't immune either. I post a thing about how it's not too hard to swap from one browser to another, and someone turns up to say they're not swapping until a power user feature they rely on exists in the other browser in exactly the same way it does on the one they're used to. and I just kinda, don't have a response to that. I don't do power user things, I'm used to having to learn new UI when I give up on something I used to work with every day. I've changed art programs enough times to get used to that.

the sort of paradox with some of these folks is that they'll argue someone is too inflexible or whatever if they can't figure out the weird way things work in their favorite thing, but if you change something about how it works, even if it's by giving people more options or useful info, they freak out. because they're inflexible.