asphericalcritic

let the crows into your heart

  • she/her

lyra; poet, critic, letterpress enthusiast

lover of crows, myth, metamorphosis, crows, tea, birds, nature, shadows, crows, crows
(i frequently share nsfw posts, fyi!)


MOKKA
@MOKKA

Animated gif from an Episode of Gundam 00 where a big Laser Cannon destroys a Space elevator
At least have an idea about the Abyss before you talk to it.

This is a re-post from my personal website.

Let me tell you, I had some trepidation when I saw that People Make Games did a video about the military industry’s involvement in wargaming and the numerous connections between the games industry and the military. After all, they have a bit of a track record of missing structural and systemic problems in their video’s subjects and instead overemphasise the role of individual responsibility in them.
However, I was not prepared for a solid hour of barely challenged military propaganda, followed by a very weak and pointless call to action at the end, that frankly I didn’t bother to watch to completion, because in my eyes the damage had already been done at that point.

The video falls on its face right at the beginning and never really manages to get anywhere from there. It starts with them repeatedly mentioning how desperate the military games sector is for new game designers, when the game industry itself is currently in a phase of repeated mass layoffs, which causes a lot of anxiety and desperation within the workforce.

Honestly, the first fifteen minutes of the video almost sound like a job advert.


vectorpoem
@vectorpoem

Modern war is extermination, twice-euphemized: first as war, then again as "defense". You are harmfully, dangerously naive if that isn't in the very front of your mind as you peer into the world of geopol consultants and conference rooms and gigadeath spreadsheets, and you're just a simpering accomplice of evil if you see its true face and your first instinct is to gesture towards "nuance", full of "complicated feelings". What exactly is complicated about it bro?


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @MOKKA's post:

"Over the entire first hour, military representatives of a western capitalist nation, with a long history of military and economic aggression against smaller countries, are allowed to present their employer as a purely defensive and reactive force against evil expansionist nations, when they are actually quite the opposite."

First off, I think overall, this post contains a lot of good critiques of the video. My minor nitpick is this specific point is the fact that they do bring up Gaza as an example of a non-defensive application. While this probably still falls under your "all they can ever offer is “awareness” and then leave you alone with having to make an “informed decision”" critique, I felt it was still worth pointing out.

I also personally found value in their drawing attention to the fact it is propaganda by going "Look, we got invited for a reason, they are getting something out of us reporting this stuff," I personally felt it encouraged me to think critically of the information presented and keep my guard up, though I understand how to others it may be a tactic for people to put their guard down.

You also alluded to structural weakness in past videos. I've heard many critiques of how they handled the Disco Elysium video, but I'm curious what other ones you've found fault with. The Roblox series in particular felt to me like the one they came down hardest on a company, which makes me wonder if there are issues I am missing/ ways they could have handled it more effectively.

I kept wondering when the pivot was coming because going on the propaganda field trip, having an entire segment airing the rationalizations of people working there, talking to nobody actually critical of the military, and then having some uncomfortable feelings about it?? it's just so insufficient to me for something you're representing as important

After having read this and thought about it, these criticisms are pretty poignant but don't really overcome this sort of...impression inertia I have about the whole thing. It's certainly weak in critiquing the issues and driving home more salient issues, now that you've overtly mentioned it, but seems to me like they've made the most likely thing to successfully straddle the line between engaging a general audience and 'meeting them halfway' and encouraging more knowledgeable folks to add on to the conversation. What made you want to stop watching certainly did the opposite for me, at least.

And that's the thing - it's difficult to imagine the general gaming public as ready and/or willing to have productive conversations about these things without taking those bumbling first steps, as opposed to the demographics we're closer to here on Cohost and in our ideological locales. Given the usual nature of arguments over the internet, it's even less likely to have folks become respectful interlocutors seeking truths, rather than verbal tribalists exchanging blows - and there's a lot of people to account for here. The irony of me comparing it to tribal warfare isn't lost on me either.

What results is a watered down version of what could've been, sure. But for what it is, they're already breaching territory that most wouldn't even experience in their day-to-day lives, myself included. I guess I'm the passive, sheltered fool of today by not throwing out the baby with the bathwater, but if that's what leads me to eventually stumble up on critiques like this that let me rethink my thoughts and actions tomorrow, then maybe it's already done it's job, and the payoff is merely delayed behind consequences.

:yeah: It's a complicated story imperfectly told, but that's what real-ass journalism looks like sometimes. I found Quinn's comments at the end poignant; most gamers aren't even aware of the subject matter. Any video that can breach that veil at all is, therefore, unfortunately, better than none.

You probably have your reasons for being so ungenerous towards their output and I do agree with your overall views on the subject matter, but I struggle to relate to what you're saying about the video.

I personally saw plenty of stuff in there that goes absolutely against them being uncritical towards military propaganda. I also think it's quite unreasonable to expect a YouTube channel about games to basically try and fix the existence of war while talking to their audience.

Not trying to be contrarian or something - I'm just pointing out the harms from the video that you're worried about may be lesser than you think and the positives from it may be greater.

With all my best wishes, but how is it my problem that you're struggling with my arguments? I didn't write this to convince others, I wrote this, because otherwise my head would have exploded yesterday.

Did not intend to present it as a problem for you to solve, sorry about the lack of clarity. I'm just offering a different point of view in the hope it helps you have a slightly more positive outlook, maybe.

I will not be engaging any further with what I now see is a very passive aggressive tone from you, thanks. The same goal could have been accomplished without behaving like an ass, but oh well.