atomicthumbs

remote sensing practicioner

gregarious canid. avatar by ISANANIKA.


Website League address
@wolf@forest.stream
send me an email
atomicthumbs@wolf.observer
twitter but hopefully i only post photos there in the future
twitter.com/atomicthumbs
newsletter!! this one will let me tell you where i go
buttondown.com/atomicthumbs
newsletter rss same thing
buttondown.com/atomicthumbs/rss
Website League (centralized federation social media project)
websiteleague.org/
Push Processing (Website League photography instance)
pushprocess.ing/
88x31 button embed code
<a href="https://wolf.observer/88x31"><img src="https://wolf.observer/images/wolf-88x31.png" style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"></a>
forest.stream (general admission website league instance)
forest.stream/
bluesky (probably just for photos)
bsky.app/profile/wolf.observer
this will be a cohost museum someday
cohost.rip/

atomicthumbs
@atomicthumbs

In the early 80s, the demand for more energy-efficient electric lights was on the rise. After a protracted development starting in the 1973 energy crisis, General Electric's Halarc Electronic effort to develop a miniature metal halide lamp to replace incandescents bore fruit in 1981, producing a lamp with high luminous efficiency, good color rendering, and "instant" restart thanks to the incandescent filament (also used as an inductor for the ballast). It was designed to be the technologically advanced future of lighting.

It almost beat the markedly superior Philips SL, the first successful compact fluorescent bulb, to market in 1981. It didn't, though, and it sucked more than CFLs, in different ways, rendering it a complete failure (discontinued in 1983), with the exception of its arc tube technology. It's mostly interesting now because it's something that could have happened but didn't, and because it looks weird, is designed weird, and behaves weird compared to what we're used to.


atomicthumbs
@atomicthumbs
  • the clear one is a GE First Light sample
  • corporations in the 80s loved to call their more efficient products "misers" for some reason. water miser, watt miser, anything like that. weird
  • if you are even slightly vulnerable to a special interest in lighting technology (one of humanity's most important achievements), clicking those links to Lamptech will ruin your entire life

You must log in to comment.

in reply to @atomicthumbs's post:

I recall reading somewhere that one of the CFL makers switched from "Miser" which no one wanted to buy to "Marathon" and emphasized the long life aspect and sales went way up. I think I had a "Marathon" way back in early CFL days. When fitting the giant thing into a lamp was hit-or miss.