Genderfucked schizoqueer autistic plural plushie eevee mystics


one of those annoying vegans your unexamined ethical system warned you about


Seer of Blood (Wyatt) and Witch of Void (fractal)


not a person, Ξ˜Ξ”, tma

this user likes the homestuck epilogues

name-color: #ff007b


🎀 psychosisposting 🎀
cohost.org/feedbackmicrophone

artemis
@artemis

An excerpt from a document we were writing earlier today:

How Many?

Any ideal solution should account for some users having hundreds or thousands of identities. Most users will only have a handful, somewhere in the 2-30 range, but I know multiple systems that are hovering around 100 or so.

PluralKit has a default limit of 1000 identities for an account. I went and asked some communities I'm in and learned that some systems do hit that limit, and ask for that limit to be increased for their account.

There's a variety of reasons for that, but the end consequence is the same: UX and protocol decisions should accommodate a large number of identities linked to an account. Friction for creating and modifying identities should be low. A large quantity of identities should not cause performance problems. Any hard-cap on the number of identities an account can have should be generous. Most people will not approach those numbers, but some will.

Obviously there are computational limits we need to work within, but we should avoid getting ourselves stuck with inefficient decisions here.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @artemis's post:

  1. identity can be objectively measured in any way
  2. identities do not overlap with other identities
  3. an identity is necessarily a person
  4. an identity is associated with one and only one body

hehehe yeah that is the funny thing about it. just, the decisions we make when we're thinking about "a small number" vs "a big number" are very different. Shifting that perspective was my primary goal with that section in the original context too