This is honestly one of the best videos I've seen about the real philosophical implications of generative art as it actually is, as opposed to the fairy story its marketing agencies are attempting to push.
Hell, even "generative art" feels like being generously euphemistic as a term, given what it actually does. "Computerized art laundering" perhaps would be more apropos, but really, these are all words that dance around what it is.
It's just art theft, plain and simple, but in grand Silicon Valley tradition, we made a computer the middle-man so we can pretend it's somehow not the same thing.
As Mildred points out, it's just about rich people being mad at creators because they still depend on them to be able to productize and capitalize culture under the capitalist regime they've created.
They hate artists, resent them, because artists are workers, and artists also get to create, something they cannot do, because their minds have been poisoned by the very practice of capitalism. Their skill set is not one of creativity, it is theft: they steal our labor and our culture and then sell it back to us for profit. It's the only thing they know how to do, and they know this about themselves, and it makes them angry.
And if you think I am being hyperbolic, here's yet another "AI art" scammer literally saying the quiet part out loud, again.