This post has content warnings for: grousing about something I saw on the suggestion forums.
- he/they
It's a horrible day on the Internet, and you are a lovely geuse.
Adult - Plants-liking queer menace - Front-desk worker of a plural system - Unapologetic low-effort poster
✨ Cohost's #1 Sunkern Fan(tm) ✨
--
(fallen london stamps by @vagorsol)
System Website
feastingwithghosts.com/RONKA SHRINE
feastingwithghosts.com/c/Phosphor/You must log in to comment.
in reply to @bazelgeuse-apologist's post:
ah yes, the second-stage-social-media toxin: "limits on social media interactions are somehow bad and we should object to them and it's definitely a virtue to curtail users' ability to politely, quietly, non-confrontationally avoid bad interactions of their own volition"
which is definitely not because outrage is considered a money metric and human moderators are too expensive to hire, no no, we need to poison persuade users so THEY think it's THEIR idea to THEIR benefit!
anyways ur right and I big agree with you. ugh. Bring back LiveJournal-era blog etiquette: YOUR space is YOUR space, and other users aren't infinitely entitled without limits to it!
LMAOOOOOOOOO there is always someone who thinks that they should not only be entitled to share their opinion, but that they should be entitled to share it WITH YOU SPECIFICALLY, and that if you are not interested in their personal ~~expression~~ THEY ARE BEING WRONGED SOMEHOW. always wild when ppl think Access To Specific People I'm Invested In is some kind of fundamental right