i guess follow me @bethposting on bsky or pillowfort


discord username:
bethposting

rhinestoneCowboy
@rhinestoneCowboy

i am not the most tech-savvy of this anti-site but the main issue with just going ahead and hosting your own video sharing and posting site is the size of the files and the actual cost of hosting the files and the site, right?

is there no way to compress video without fucking decimating the quality and even if there was, would this even be a fix?


bethposting
@bethposting

yeah video storage is really costly and hard to do at large scales, and if you're streaming video there's a whole additional set of really difficult things to deal with. like, all the big platforms with streaming video have CDNs (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_delivery_network) which reduce latency by having the video sent from somewhere physically closer. there's a reason there's not much in the way of real competition for youtube. you'd need a massive amount of capital to start and even then there's no guarantee you'll get an audience because of network effects. if no big creators upload there, then there's no viewers, and if there's no viewers there won't be a motivation for creators to upload there. even microsoft couldn't launch a twitch competitor after paying the streamer ninja an obscene amount to use it


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @rhinestoneCowboy's post:

You might be right for the bigger sites. It's mainly the size of videos (the only way to compress further is to compromise on quality) which I imagine is in the petabytes. If there was a better way to compress videos, YT would have already looked into it. Another issue would be related to networking and global distribution - needs to be responsive, widely accessible, duplicated across multiple regions, resilient to expected loads... but using a cloud provider should help mitigate some of these issues.

Though I think the main reason why social media sites fail in general is that they don't reach a critical mass of users or lack a financial model to sustain them. Cohost has a subscription model which is a good start, and Mastodon is self-hosted (?) so most of the costs can be borne by the users themselves. But basically you'd have to overcome the cold start problem.

And if you want to build a traditional social media site, there's recommendation and discoverabilty algorithms that you'd have to implement and iterate on. But I guess if you're on cohost then you might not care as much about that haha