we must understand that the division between sandwich and taco is incidental, and an interface demanded by the distinction between the world of rendered perceptions and the world of others. these words are mere finities that represent a unity. the unity is not divided only to create the finity. It is divided in a madúl way, and in a way such that divisions are arbitrary and beget arbitrary subdivisions. To analyze in a fractal way is to analyze in a way that is divine, communal, and gamelike-- and therefore holy. The goal is to recreate the unity not as a sum of its parts, but as an object fully understood; the finities are only rendered opposites as it is useful to simultaneously implode the unity, or hoist it by its own petard.
- she/her, they/them, sie/sie/ir, ask
dyke, poetess, games writer, &cet.
wow! this lesbian can pierce space and time!
if you can see this,
you have permission to message me on discord
You must log in to comment.
in reply to @hezdhalia's post:
Ah Thalia I really like this framework as a way of thinking about these kinds of conversations. Like in ling undergrad we would have very minute silly conversations breaking the hot dog/taco thing further (is a salad with croutons a sandwich was a memorable one) and it was exactly this - a communal, gamelike, and divine process wherein the point is not actually to break it down into this granular understanding of This or That but better (and playfully!) understand the Thing as a whole and perhaps even upend the way we considered such unities.