This post contains 18+ content. You can view it if you're over 18.
This post has content warnings for: Tumblr ask including the phrase "sex with stuffed animals", fandom policing.
This page's posts are visible only to users who are logged in.
neuropeculiar dog adjacent thing
- he/him
mid 30s / ⚧ / ∞ / 🌲 south sound area
furaffinity
www.furaffinity.net/user/bootjackdreamwidth
bootjack.dreamwidth.org/profilepillowfort i guess
www.pillowfort.social/bootjackYou must log in to comment.
in reply to @Loosf's post:
The way the ask is phrased also implies that the post the OP actually reblogged did not involve plushie NSFW, so it's like, "you can't engage with this blog in any way that treats them like a human being because they also post stuff that I don't personally approve of" which is just so disgusting. What if the plushfucker also makes some absolutely top tier shitposts? I'm certain I've reposted funny stuff from predominantly NSFW blogs to my main before, the nice thing about Cohost is there's no fourteen year olds policing that shit and trying to send alerts or whatever the hell to my asks. As OP said, literally Who Gives A Shit
Yeah seriously that is… Hi these assholes have made me feel like I'm supposed to hate myself for liking the action movie equivalent of Sims "suspicious pool ladder disappearances" but like. THIS.
what's the ethical difference between having sex with an inanimate object (vibrator) vs. having sex with an inanimate object (plushie)
A certain "essence" perhaps
just like "Oh no not pup hoods" seem to think that the masks have some sort of essential taint that makes them Extra-Bad
From a purely pragmatic standpoint I see one as being much harder to clean but I highly doubt that's on the mind of anyone actually involved in the question
Pinned Tags