bruno

"mr storylets"

writer (derogatory). lead designer on Fallen London.

http://twitter.com/notbrunoagain


THESE POSTS ARE PROVIDED “AS IS”, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE POSTS OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE POSTS.


Bluesky
brunodias.bsky.social

iliana
@iliana

i’m worried about the future of traffic calming devices if more cars are self-driving and just drive whatever speed limit the GIS database they happen to have says it can go. just because the city speed limit in seattle is 25 doesn’t mean you should go 25 down a tight residential street with barely one lane to move in.

i think we need to start pivoting cities toward traffic destruction devices


NireBryce
@NireBryce

just tell GIS all roads are 2mph, every problem solved


bruno
@bruno

traffic calming device: looney-tunes esque "tunnel painted into cliff" but it's a big cardboard sign screen printed with a generative adversarial network basilisk that makes autonomous vehicles crash into a concrete bollard


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @iliana's post:

this makes me very curious how self-driving interacts with/misbehaves around traffic calming circles, particularly if changing direction of travel makes the sensors less able to see pedestrian traffic because I could imagine that's easily possible

cars should realy become part of the infrastructure... private ownership of cars was a good idea, but we should just pool them all and drive to and from work with whatever public car is currently available.

car theft? O_o what're they gonna do, go off-planet?

in reply to @bruno's post: