BUT there was a local minimum in 1990 when it looked like hogwash might be in decline… there was to be no room for hogwash in the future-oriented late 80s…
in 1990 francis fukuyama predicted the end of hogwash
"mr storylets"
- he/him
- brunodias.dev/
writer (derogatory). lead designer on Fallen London.
http://twitter.com/notbrunoagain
THESE POSTS ARE PROVIDED “AS IS”, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE POSTS OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE POSTS.
Bluesky
brunodias.bsky.social
Letterboxd
letterboxd.com/notbrunoagain/Backloggd
www.backloggd.com/u/notbrunoagain/You must log in to comment.
in reply to @matthewseiji's post:
There are more people saying hogwash... but is the average person saying hogwash more? I actually overlaid this with the world population graph and studies say yes, though I can't tell if this is simply due to a greater proportion of the world speaking english or if it is truly a hogwash renaissance.
the real question, is the rise of people saying hogwash actually just correlated with the amount of actual hogwash
How does anyone, upon turning on the news, not come to the immediate conclusion that the world is just at maximal amounts of hogwash
The original graph is already measured in frequency per million so I think it's relative to the total word output referenced by ngrams
"Hogwash Georg, who lives in cave & says it 10,000 each day, is an outlier adn should not have been counted"