bruno

"mr storylets"

writer (derogatory). lead designer on Fallen London.

http://twitter.com/notbrunoagain


THESE POSTS ARE PROVIDED “AS IS”, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE POSTS OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE POSTS.


Bluesky
brunodias.bsky.social

So the word essay originally meant a test (or the act of testing); it comes from the same middle French root as assay. From this sense of weighing or evaluating something, it drifted to mean an attempt, test, or rehearsal; in Portuguese for example the cognate ensaio means exactly that, rehearsal. The modern sense of 'essay' carries this semantic forward in that an essay is, essentially, a take. It's an attempt at saying something about something in a self-contained way, temporally limited both in that it's the perspective of one moment and in that it's meant to be short. A written essay is your 2000-word stab at something.

Which is why it's very funny to me that 'video essay' has drifted to mean specifically the genre of youtube video defined mostly by expanding runtimes. Like almost nothing really stylistically or structurally connects video essayists; a video essay can be narration over archival footage, it can be motion graphics, it can be a talking head, it can be commentary over a reproduced edit of a movie, it can be skits, it can be interviews. But the thing that 'video essay' seems to imply now is that it's at least an hour long, and the longer it is the more it enters the video essay category.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @bruno's post:

i think this is in part due to the fact that many youtubers were, and perhaps still are, very bad at arguing a coherent and well-formed thesis concisely. i think the only "video essayist" i watch (although i dont even know how to define a video essayist anymore) who really uses every minute of their time convincingly is dan olson.

WOW i came here to say exactly this. i try to hit a sweet spot of time; i know people like their long videos to play while doing other stuff, but i'd rather your focus for a short time be dense and rewatchable. tight, short, rewatchable, sticks with you afterwards