What is even the point of the site now lol
That’s like 75% of the content on there, at least.
“In accordance with our payment processors” man, I love it when my wallet decides what I can and can’t spend the money in it on 🤪
professional lame older brother
- he/she/it
hiiii i am nicholas (or serafina sometimes, whenever aer comes out)
im like if a boy was a doll or a bug or a girl or some other thing
im transfem
im 22
dont follow if under 18 pls
i like bugs, video games, messing around with computer, guns and knives and weapons in general and also other stuff
[dividers by @haxxydraws]
my twitter
www.twitter.com/deadgirldeluxeserafina’s profile (aer doesn’t use social media much, but just in case)
cohost.org/false-angel
You must log in to comment.
in reply to @alyaza's post:
I think that every NSFW content creator who wants to be able to sell their material online should consider picking up HTML and building their own website, or hiring a porn-friendly web dev to do it for them. It's a necessary skill at this point.
Dead serious, Gumroad was the only worthwhile storefront IMO that openly hosted NSFW art sales. Besides Subscribestar, which isn't a storefront but a subscription model, we don't have a lot when it comes to displaying and selling physical media especially. Gumroad itself was never great for that either, tbh, but at least it was allowed.
FreeCodeCamp is where I've been trying to learn in my spare time, maybe it will help someone: https://www.freecodecamp.org/
yeah that's a good question given that it's the payment processors pushing all of this
So, this is a reasonable concern and one that I promise I didn't forget about, but honestly it's just more complicated...there are some things we just don't have as much control over. That being said!
Way I see it right now is one of three options. Keep in mind I'm US-based and I got a lot of these sites I found from this somewhat outdated Github thread.
-
If your business is at a point where you can afford to do this, consider applying for an explicitly high-risk payment processor like Pay Diverse or Payment Cloud. This is the safest option, imo, but I'm not at a place where I feel like it's worthwhile for me to do it yet.
-
Do research into the TOS's of free payment processors that are not Square, Paypal, and Stripe. I use Wave--yes, it has an Obscenity Clause, but there's a ton of legal grey area with what defines "obscenity" vs "erotica" that it's certainly better than the alternatives. I know there are other choices, but I haven't looked into them as deeply.
-
Still an option: Continue operating under-the-table on a more hostile payment processor and site host, and just list NSFW items as vaguely as possible--no images, descriptions, etc. Don't link the account to your socials on that website, but you can redirect customers from your NSFW socials there, and provide examples on your socials of what the items actually are. This is...clunky. But, hey, that's the world we live in.
In terms of a concrete, proven method of connecting a payment processor of your choice to your NSFW website and the success rate of doing so without that support being pulled, that is beyond me currently. I'm no coder, really, I am only a porn artist with dreams ^^' but I'm guessing you'd have an easier time with these methods.
This makes me wonder about the possibility of someone creating a financial institution explicitly to cater to NSFW creators. Or if American Express or Discover or some other existing org could commit to freedom of expression and gain a whole new niche market.
There is also Pillowfort, which considers itself NSFW and adult content friendly and is user funded, which means that is unlikely to change.
in reply to @DespiaShrq's post:
recently i started getting a flood of emails from pinterest - a website i haven't used since shortly after its release in 2012 - that they have removed this and that pin due to violating their rules on mature content, which according to them includes all nudity (indiscriminately), "sexualised content" regardless if any nudity is present (hmm), any depictions of sexual activity be it images or text, and "fetish imagery" with absolutely no further explanation (you know this includes all of us queer freaks who are a fetish for simply existing...). i have no idea what is on that board because it was forever ago, but i can guarantee it wasn't anything intended to be interpreted as sexual, because it was a public moodboard for a cutesy girly girl oc and that wasn't her vibe.
just mind boggling and exhausting and why do they even bother? i was under the impression pinterest is all but forgotten.
welp, time to back up every avatar i've ever purchased off gumroad, just in case gumroad decides i might be able to get my rocks off to any one of them
"Furry is a kink" as a justification to ban all furry stuff doesn't sound unlikely yeah.
Really side-eyeing the explicit callout of breast expansion in a world where adjustable breast size is standard for avatar customisation.
—🜂
like The Sims can have a boob slider with no problems so what's wrong with VR avatars having that
