caela-argent

Bi Fork Claded -@derharkil

21 | ΘΔ

Pfp by Distressed Egg

Red Fox, Bi Enby Chaos Wizard, Writer of Smut and fiction. BLM + Trans Rights

Magic-Using Dog running on Cat software.

18+ Only!


invis
@invis
This page's posts are visible only to users who are logged in.

WebsterLeone
@WebsterLeone

It's pin/socket and plug/jack (or plug/receptacle).

Edit: To clarify, this is already in use in the industry. Pin/socket are the electrical contacts. Plug is generally "the part on the cable" and jack/receptacle "the part on the device" but inline jacks of course make that a little iffy. I'm all for plug to involve the screw/post/latch and jack to involve nut/anchor/keep.

Edit 2: No, that does not mean the entire industry is using it, but we already have a solution for it that a lot of (yes not all) manufacturers use (whether or not random sites that resell parts stick with it is another thing entirely).



You must log in to comment.

in reply to @invis's post:

I've actually had this thought rattle about in my head several times over the years. To me, in the simplest case, plug is associated with the pin, and socket with the hole, with the example springing to mind being the classic TRS style connector. This contrasts with connectors that have a recessed pin and extruded hole, like the coaxial F connector. For that case, one way would be to consider the plug to be the part that enters a void in the socket, but to my mind, it makes more sense that the pin is always the plug and the hole is always the socket. So to specify something like the F connector, you might say "inverted plug" and "inverted socket". For the category, something as simple as "connector" might be ok, and a device for connecting two similar ends might be a "(plug/socket) cross connector", or a "dual (plug/socket) (connector/adapter)". People tend to come up with their own names for such devices anyway.

Let's just call the pin part "1" (because it's a thing) and the socket part "0" (because it's a hole, or absence of a thing)

The digit 1 even resembles a pin and 0 resembles a hole

Master/slave never made much sense to begin with, and even less so with modern complex devices that send commands back and forth. Host/peripheral probably works better here, or primary/secondary, controller/target etc, depending on the actual devices.

When I used to teach computer science classes, I'd occasionally need to stop the class an apologize for the decades of ha-ha-it-sounds-like-saying-an-inappropriate-thing terminology and to hope that nobody was listening in to the lectures. So many racist stereotypes, so much terminology clearly kept because it sounds like heterosexual sex, and probably more.