• she/her

(Help, idk how to use this site and I'm too scared to ask)


retroheart
@retroheart

I'm not at all surprised by it, but it's incredible to see how seamless the shift was over the past 18 months or so from NFTs to AI without even a nanosecond of reflection.

Like both on the level of techbro types tween frame sliding from "NFTs are about artists, actually" to "AI generation lets us cut out the artist entirely" as well as companies like Facebook/Meta trying to get in on crypto just as NFTs are crashing and are now haphazardly launching an AI in Messenger that lets people generate Mickey Mouse holding a bloody knife.

Just. Absolute chef's kiss of a demonstration of how little these people actually care about the creative process as long as they can keep overhead down to make a line go up because money is nothing more than keeping score at this point.

Thanks for coming to my TEDx talk


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @retroheart's post:

another big reason for the big push and pivot to AI is because it's the last thing techbros have left; Bitcoin forked out into a million dead-ends, the bottom fell out on NFTs, the Metaverse exploded on the launchpad. once AI goes kaput, the well's completely tapped.

The thing that stands out to me is that AI is the most likely to succeed, which is why those previous things were so swiftly abandoned. The bottom fell out of cryptocurrency when it became a speculative asset that resulted in a chain of Greater Fools left holding the bag, while NFTs were pretty quickly exposed as the scam they are to also sell crypto.
The Metaverse at its most cohesive point was a way for one of the most fundamentally uncreative people on the planet to re-envision sitting around an office (by spending hundreds of dollars on a VR headset) while ALSO being unhinged to the point where every possible online space from Fortnite to IRC is a Metaverse, because the Metaverse has to be inevitable, otherwise how will people buy in? All of the above is too dense, confusing, restrictive, insert other descriptor here for most people to want to engage with it.

AI is different, though, since it's readily available via tools people already have with an absurdly low barrier to entry, which makes it attractive to use. It doesn't cost money, you're not putting anything on your face, there's no ugly monkey JPGs attached to it. Instead, it can do your homework, or generate art, or write a story, or tell you how to make napalm if you work your dead grandmother into the prompt. And companies have already sucked up all the data they possibly could and, after they were done, kindly told us we can opt-out in the future, maybe, if they feel like it.

It's not particularly surprising that massive companies would win out in the end, all vying to be the kingmakers of the future while a handful of others hope to feed off of table scraps so they can someday be the boot that's on everyone else's neck.

I know this is the smoke from the oftentimes literal fires of late-stage capitalism taking its final form, but I think that it hits the criteria of being fast, low-cost (or free), and easy for people to use makes it that much more of a threat and why other technologies were abandoned seemingly overnight.