chasejxyz

✍s 🐦‍🔥, 🏳️‍⚧️🌕🐺, 🐉, and 📡👽

Queer Buddhist Bird ✧ Digital Storyteller ✧ Bad Taste Haver ✧ Aspiring Home Cook ✧ Bird Fact Dispenser ✧ Third-Rate Duelist ✧ Zoid-er ✧ Furry Writer's Guild-er ✧ Codexian ✧🌹🚲 ✧ ⚦

You can find all of my writing [here]!


[Flags source] [Buttons/stamps source]


my normal regular human site for regular humans
www.chasej.xyz/
linkedin where i pretend to be a real professional and not a bird on the internet
www.linkedin.com/in/chasejxyz/

Scampir
@Scampir

Everybody wants to talk about the technology of steampunk but never what fuel is needed to run it. It's coal btw. Might as well call that shit coal-fantasy.


xenofem
@xenofem

"uhhh... oh, that's not coal smoke, it's steam! steam from the steamed punks we're having! mmmm, steamed punks!"


margot
@margot

ever since i found out that nuclear plants produce power by just making steam really fast, and therefore nuclear power is also steampunk, i've been so mad about this


chasejxyz
@chasejxyz

There's really only two ways to make electricity:

  • Fake photosynthesis (solar panels)
  • Make a thing go spinny

To make a thing spin, some sort of fluid needs to push it. Hydroelectric plants use the energy in water going down (gravity is probably the only true infinitely renewable energy source out there), for example, wind directly makes a thing spin, and then everyone else makes a gas hot, and the hotter the gas the more it likes to move around and push against stuff, such as a thing that can spin.

It doesn't have to be (water) steam, but it usually is, since water is 1. easy to get on Earth 2. cheap 3. usually does not catch on fire, especially when heated.

(i did read a steampunk novel recently where things had an energy source that was a magic rock so i think it was more nuclear-steampunk than coal-steampunk but maybe they haven't figured out ionizing radiation is a thing yet which oops thats gonna suck for everyone since everyone has several tiny nuclear reactors in their house)


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @Scampir's post:

I got an author very, very mad at me for writing a near-future adventure story and calling it "steampunk" when everything was atomic-energy fueled

didn't wanna listen to me when I demonstrated that nuclear energy is a very expensive way to BOIL WATER

Sounds like that author needs to read the first story Di Filippo's Steampunk Trilogy (1995), which happens to be the original use of the word "steampunk." Without giving too much away, you are exactly correct.