• he/him

Chicago Game Developer

Project lead, programmer, & composer at @CantGetEnoughGames (http://cantgetenoughgames.com)

Other socials: https://twitter.com/thom_cotay | https://mas.to/@thomcote


lcsrzl
@lcsrzl

For children who were raised with smartphones, by contrast, that foundation is missing. It is probably no coincidence that the iPhone itself, originally released in 2007, is approaching college age


NoelBWrites
@NoelBWrites

So I went back to school in my 30s and this is my first semester, which means I'm in classes with a bunch of 18-year-old kids. I also have some older classmates that went back to school later in life, like I did.

So far the main difference I see is that the teenagers can't read. Not "can't understand complex texts" or "have no nuance" or "miss more subtle themes or rhetorical tricks." I really mean "can't effectively decode the words on the page." Even the ones that are super into the schoolwork and eagerly participating in class!

  • English class, students confused about the linear chronology of the text. As in, thinking that things happened in a different order or inverting cause and effect. This is a very straightforward text, but the narrator does reflect on things after the fact sometimes. I'm thinking some of the students are identifying some of the words that describe the events and not the words that make it clear this is someone remembering it.

  • Student reading a text out loud and skipping words or "reading" different words that the ones on the text, that start with the same letter and kind of make sense but not really. Think substituting "horse" for "house" in the sentence "I love my parents' house." Yeah, it makes sense but nobody mentioned a horse anywhere else in the text and the rest of the paragraph is describing a house.

  • Online class, assignment is a written questionnaire that we had to post on our little forum. Half the students straight up answered different questions than the ones asked. Not even complicated, trick questions, I'm talking extremely straightforward. Like "How big is Lake Michigan?" "Lake Michigan is blue" kind of thing. Maybe they are identifying a couple of words and then guessing at what the question may be?

I was second-guessing myself, thinking that maybe I'm being a Cranky Old Lady and complaining about The Youths, but I showed the online assignment to some friends and they agreed the questions were clear and that the students were not actually answering them in a way that went beyond normal "students half-assing their homework."

This article kind of confirmed it's an actual trend and not me being an asshole. And then reading about the absolute dogshit reading pedagogy that doesn't actually teach kids to decode words and sound them out? Fuck, I also would stop reading every two paragraphs and go do something else if most of my reading was guessing at what's on the page.


jaidamack
@jaidamack

Is this why 'kids these days' don't give a shit that LLMs and other GPT-adjacent garbage are abject nonsense? They just... can't see it's gibberish?


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @lcsrzl's post:

oh my god I was literally talking about this with my friends yesterday.

The biggest difference I see between my younger classmates and the classmates that are older is that the youngest can't actually read. Like it goes beyond "the kids can't tease out nuanced complexities in the text." They will make up things not in the text, they don't understand the basic chronology of a linear narrative, they will change words for ones that start with the same letter and kind of make sense when reading out loud, they will answer a completely different question than the one asked in the assignments.

I was doubting whether I was being unfair and shaking my cane at these kids so they would get off my lawn, but it seems to be an actual trend.

on a post about declining literacy i almost just relinked the op article. :eggbug-nervous:

but it’s absolutely a very concerning trend that began with punitive based systems like No Child Left Behind but was exacerbated by standardized testing in general and horribly flawed systems like reading recovery (which actually makes kids worse readers as they grow up)

about 15% of adults in america are functionally illiterate - they can’t read street signs. we’ve known it was a growing issue even in the 00s and 10s but it seems like smartphones and the pandemic took and accelerated it considerably. even the way modern media is designed around 4000 word count max articles because the research shows that attention starts to wander after that. that number used to be around 10000 words.

suffice to say, this is not a “back in my day” situation but absolutely a crisis.

I read the APM story on the Reading Recovery strategies in 2019 and I could not believe teachers were literally teaching kids how to guess words instead of reading them

And it's absolutely what I'm seeing in my younger classmates. Reading out loud and skipping words, making up words that kind of make sense and start with the same letter as the one they skipped, etc.

Not to derail, but I'm glad it's not just me: articles are really getting shorter. Every time I finish an article lately I'm left feeling confused, like--where's the rest of it? I assumed for a while that nobody could afford to pay for long-form journalism anymore, but maybe it's more the case that fewer people can read it.

it also means less details which means more advertiser friendly and more articles published which means more eyes. i think those studies are used more to have an excuse to keep word count short.

This is scary, I know that their are kids who were functional literate leaving primary school, but three years into secondary and no longer literate - usually due to life, but the idea that school is failing kids in this way is awful...

in reply to @NoelBWrites's post:

obviously the article goes into a little more depth but here's some more anecdotal evidence:

my wife is a therapist who was based in a middle school as recently as a couple years ago - when she asks kids what their favorite classes are, they've pretty much flipped from my recollection as someone who is in their thirties or forties

kids like: math!
kids don't like: english, science

even the smart, motivated kids don't necessarily read books for fun anymore, and why would they when the way they learned to read makes it hard to learn new vocabulary

i can't help but think this is in part because math education has gotten a little more engaging and literacy education has gotten significantly worse. science is sort of collateral damage since so much of it is basically learning vocab and reading textbooks (or was when i was a kid, i'm less informed on the science curriculum vs reading and math)

wow that is surprising

I wonder if part of why kids love math now is not just that we're doing better at teaching it but also this cultural worship for STEM as well

Thinking not only about the messages kids receive about math, but also about the resources available to engage them with the subject, educational games, programs, etc...

i was gonna get into this in my last comment but it felt like it was going off the rails, but basically in the 1940s and early 1950s there was a very successful movement to make school almost all humanities and no stem. the idea was that science and math were unneeded in daily life but humanities was what was important to be a good member of society.

then sputnik and the space race happened and when the US gov’t looked for engineers and scientists they found a massive dearth of them. so there was basically a massive reform that turned the focus of the US education system to producing as many calculus knowing stem folks as possible. it’s why HS math targets calculus instead of statistics even though statistics is more broadly relevant AND teaches critical thinking. then with the US “winning” the space race and the tech booms that followed, the focus on STEM became greater than ever.

if you mix in how standardized testing punishes actual critical thinking in the reading sections (ie any q about themes will always be answered explicitly in the text not in interpretation to make it “standardized”). add to it the other aspects and now reading/writing feel rote and boring while stem has had loads of educational content and engaging activities.

As an adult student in college taking macroeconomics and accounting, at least these math courses are absolute garbage and frequently just sort of toss out ideas and don't go into depth on them that is expected in tests, leaving the entire class baffled. And I feel like my whole life I've encountered this sort of problem in every single math class I've taken: The book gives a few examples, then the questions use forms of the equations that the book didn't go over and I'm supposed to reverse engineer this, somehow.

I do think I missed a lot of basic things that people seem to treat as normal, so maybe I was just in school before math classes got better and so missed out on any benefit I might have had and am now missing an entire foundation.

Or maybe this IS the better math class, and I would just be incredibly depressed if I actually sat in a basic English class by comparison, since I had no trouble learning reading but math has always been an exercise in frustration.

desperately trying to figure out how reading recovery works because there's been a lot of alt-education work over the years in reading for meaning, and i cannot actually tell what rr is actually doing beyond a vague reference to constructivism

This goes into it. I don't know if it specifically calls out "reading recovery" programs but it does go into the pedagogy of the "three cue system" and "balanced literacy" that the reading recovery programs use.

https://www.apmreports.org/episode/2019/08/22/whats-wrong-how-schools-teach-reading

It boils down to ignoring phonic instruction (sounding out letters) in favor of a "three cue" system. Kids are instructed to look for "cues" that will tell them what word they're looking at, instead of sounding the word out.

The first cue is the context: are there pictures? What's the topic of the text?
The second is the grammar: is this word likely to be a noun or a verb?
And the third is the spelling pattern: what are the first and last letters? What's the length of the word?

So kids are reading a book that says "The horse jumps the fence" and will look at the illustration of a horse jumping the fence. So they can kind of guess what the sentence is about. They see the word "horse" starts with an H and ends with an E, but houses can't jump, so it probably means horse... and so on.

And I want to stress that this three cue approach is not about "figuring out what a new word means." It's about "figuring out what is written on the page."

You can see how this approach makes it almost impossible to figure out new words and how it leads itself to misreading texts, especially when there aren't clear pictures or for more abstract and advanced topics.

read through, i don't think i've heard of this specific method before, most times i hear of whole language or similar stuff it's about allowing kids to write poems or whatever and focusing on the joy of it rather than correcting spelling mistakes. (i am also well over a decade out of date on what's been going on in education studies)

i will say this article reads a little weird to me, because i don't remember seeing any of the three cue stuff as a 90s kid in elementary school. maybe i just didn't know where to look when i was seven, but i know there were lots of vocabulary tests and weekly spelling quizzes, not to mention lots of ads for hooked on phonics presented by alex trebek. i feel like i lived in a world where phonics was the primary focus of reading education, and the apm article comes from the berenstain dimension. (maybe that dimension's just california?)

sorry this is a rant, i am just truly horrified by what i just read in that apm article you just linked.

i am reading this article and screaming-crying-throwing up how is this real. i was in elementary school from the 90s to early 00s and it was always phonics. this feels like, literally like i want this to be a hoax, i want this to be a weird joke. this is so upsetting to my brain. i feel like i have suddenly realized that i am in a horror movie. like, its always upsetting knowing how much cognitive and sociological research gets ignored in how schools are structured. but the fact that like, we had this right with Phonics like, a goddamn century ago, but then threw it in the trash because??? why??? all i can think is that the cueing method would work really well to get children who are reading below grade level to pass a multiple choice test that includes pictures. tests can be written with the cue-ing method in mind to, basically, give kids hints so that if they cant read they will still be able to pick the correct of four options and pass the test. which is just horrific.

like, we cant get the school day moved later so teens are not subjected to borderline torture conditions of sleep deprivation, despite decades of research saying that is what we are doing to them, but we can implement this utter nonsense that has barely any supporting research and just reams and reams of disproving research. like, if im understanding the timeline from the article correctly, this was proposed in the late 60s, debunked in the 70s, had 2 more decades of debunking research, and then began being implemented in a widespread way in the 2000s? because why???? Schools are so resistant to evidence-based change, why is it that one of the few things they changed was scrapping PHONICS???

Is it possible that, in addition to standardized tesing, it in any way comes down to the fact that sounding-out words in a classroom context means allowing all the kids to be making noise while they read, and the 3 cues can all be done silently?

Its just like, I need to be understood: I would not rely solely on my gut reaction if there was not a ton of cog-sci research supporting phonics. But given that the research supports it, it also just seem so mind-numbingly obvious that you should connect oral language-acquisition with written language acquisition. like, the way the 3-cues ppl are dismissive of KNOWING WHAT THE WORDS ON THE PAGE ARE is, idk, Orwellian? It disgusts me. Im glad I know this now??? But also yikes!!

According to r/teachers (I haven't read the preceding article yst since I'm at work), it's because research shows that advanced readers, people who are familiar with reading, like you and I, read going off the shapes of words and the vibes, rather than . So admin decided to try to skip to that stage by directly teaching 'cuing' rather than realising that phonics is an important intermediate step in between non-literacy and advanced literacy.

This is reminding me of a college experience which has been haunting me ever since it happened: I took an English class last semester where a regular part of the homework was reading one another’s papers and commenting on them. I had written a paper about addiction and the ways our society has failed to treat it in a meaningful way. So I’m looking at the comments my classmates has given me, and one of them is asking me questions about transgender people. Here’s the thing: I had not written about transgender people anywhere in my paper; it was like this person responding to points I had never made. I was baffled; what was this guy talking about? And then it hit me: I hadn’t written anything about transgender people, but I had written about transgenerational trauma. This person saw the word “transgenerational” and read it as “transgender.” And like, I don’t want to be an asshole because I get my words mixed up from time to time too. But there was just something about it that kind of gave me this feeling of dread in regards to my peers’ reading comprehension

Yeah it's definitely making me look at certain weird interactions I've had where the other person was arguing with something I had not written. And at the time I thought it was bad faith but now I'm thinking maybe it wasn't

iirc educational methodology was a politicized issue and teaching phonics was the Right side of the issue, in their eternal quest to roll back education to 1950 in every way that they could. Shitty christian schools would advertise 'Phonics based reading curriculum' on their shortlist on why you should send your kid there. Unfortunately, it seems like the usually good heuristic of 'do the opposite of what the shitty right is doing' led institutions astray in this case.

in reply to @jaidamack's post:

Probably! I've been feeling insane because reading whatever sludge LLMs spit out is an almost painful experience and I could not understand why anyone would be okay using them, but... apparently for some people it's no more painful an experience than reading normal, human-generated text!