Obviously, we must linger a bit and talk about the elephant in the room: Sean O'Brien's speech at the RNC, his endorsement of an abysmal Josh Hawley article, and the resultant backlash to both.
Let's be clear: the Teamsters have not covered themselves in particular glory this year, and it would not be serious to argue otherwise. Although they've been at the head of a number of important struggles in the past year or so, it is simply impossible to ignore the increasing chumminess its leadership has with scabs and far-right politics.
That started with O'Brien's meeting with Donald Trump—and has continued through the union's donations to the Republican Party and specifically to self-avowed Christian nationalist Josh Hawley. Literally none of this is politically defensible: Trump is a scab and a fascist, the Republican Party is categorically anti-working class, and Hawley's "pro-labor" shtick is kayfabe. But you could begrudgingly let this slide, I guess, as just ordinary access politicking.
What you cannot let slide, however, is showing up at the RNC for any reason.1 Or giving a major speech that legitimizes Trump as a populist who cares about working people, just days before he denounces the UAW's efforts to rebuild the labor movement. Or effectively touting J.D. Vance2 as a tribune of the working class who has "been right there on all our issues." Or praising Josh Hawley—the self-professed Christian nationalist who, again, is not seriously "pro-labor"—for really any reason.3
Nor can O'Brien skate on politicking as an excuse for de facto endorsing Hawley's vehemently racist and transphobic op-ed, in which he argues working class people have been sold out in favor of “diversity, equity, and inclusion and the religion of the trans flag.” O'Brien's claim that he merely "channel[s] the response from many of his members" when speaking highly of people like Hawley is at best embarrassing (and a total abdication of his responsibility); and at worst a complete lie to conceal his own reactionary politics.
Luckily, it's clear that many within the Teamsters and the labor movement as a whole see this for what it is and do not stand for it. From Labor Notes and DSA members; to the internals of the Teamsters; to the vice president of the Teamsters and the president of the AFL-CIO, O'Brien's actions are getting the reception they should here. It is unfortunately true that many people will still agree with O'Brien (for one reason or another), but the response has been heartening overall. Optimistically? It'll make O'Brien rethink the course he's steering the Teamsters on. If need be? This should serve as the base from which to oust him.
-
Which for instance officially printed signs demanding MASS DEPORTATION NOW! during its third day.
-
Who has voted with the AFL-CIO's priorities literally never
-
Who has voted with the AFL-CIO's priorities a whole 11% of the time.