From illegal mining operations to an on-going coup attempt, what is happening between Twitter and Brazil?

Why was Twitter Suspended?

It started when Twitter refused to follow orders from the STF (Federal Supreme Court, headed by the minister Alexandre de Moraes) to take down accounts that spread misinformation during the 2022 elections and participated in the 2023 coup attempt (more on that later). By refusing to cooperate, Twitter infringed laws of national security and accumulated a fine equivalent to U$3,2 million.

Musk also refused to pay the fine. STF threatened to arrest the Twitter representatives in Brazil if the fine didn't get paid, which caused Musk to remove Twitter offices from Brazil. It goes without saying that having a company operating in Brazil without any legal representatives is another crime. Moraes gave Twitter 24h to elect a representative in the country, another offer that Musk refused. After this point, the suspension of Twitter was inevitable, and with it, the 20 million Brazilian users. The suspension should be lifted when Musk pays his fines and elects a company representative here. Masterful gambit, Elon.

It didn't help that Musk kept sharing epic memes comparing Alexandre de Moraes to Voldemort, and an AI generated image illustrating the Federal Judge behind bars.

Moraes suggested at some point that VPN apps should be taken out of App stores, and that anyone "caught" using a VPN to use Twitter (somehow) would be fined to an equivalent of U$8k. The measure was most likely taken to prevent big accounts - such as that of Brazilian politicians - to use the website. He later backtracked on both decisions.

All this debacle had some people talk about a supposed "judicial dictatorship". This term has a history.

Dictatorship??!!??

So, a bit of historical context.
2022 was a presidential election year in Brazil. The polls were disfavorable to Bolsonaro (the ex-military, far-right president at the time), indicating that Lula (a social democrat, ex-president from 2003-2011) had chances of winning it in the first turn. Bolsonaro's Brazilian military instincts kicked in and he summoned his ministers to plan a coup beforehand WHILE FUCKING FILMING THEMSELVES DOING IT.

The ministers were hesitant about the idea of a coup, citing mainly the lack of international support they'd have for it. A pitiful attempt at a coup was carried out in January 8th 2023, copy and pasting US' January 6th "insurrection", resulting in the partial destruction of government buildings followed by the arrest of the people who participated in it.

Suffice to say, the coup was unsuccessful.

The lesson was learned. Brazil wouldn't be able to support another military dictatorship without international support. Far-right pundits immediately started working towards building that support as soon as Lula got elected. The plan was to frame Brazil as a nation that abandoned democracy to become a left-wing dictatorship. Now every move the government did to enforce it's own laws against hate speech or punish those responsible for the coup attempt, would be denounced as an act of authoritarianism and violation of human rights.

In March this year, Eduardo Bolsonaro (one of Bolsonaro's sons and currently a congressman) lead an informal press release in front of Washington's capitol (he was barred from making a hearing inside the capitol, you see) advocating for American politicians to impose sanctions to Brazil due to it's "Judiciary dictatorship" and "violation of human rights" (read: The imprisonment of the people who trashed the congress buildings during the "coup attempt")

Here's Paulo Figueiredo, vlogger, and the grandson of a Brazilian military dictator, on PragerU spewing out the bullshit that Lula's election was illegitimate. The constant parallels he makes between Brazil and US, as well as the repetition of the mantra at the end "here, like in Brazil" make it a naked attempt to gather sympathy from the American far-right.

The propaganda efforts might be having some effect, since some Republican representatives have been regurgitating Brazilian conservative talk-point verbatim. Here's Maria Elvira Salazar doing just that (hey isn't that Paulo Figueiredo at the end?)

Be suspicious whenever you see the Brazilian dictatorship talking point being spread. It is an on-going attempt to undermine our democracy.

The far-right has a very clear strategy to spread their propaganda, and Twitter had a part in it. From the top 10 most used social medias in Brazil, Twitter was the least popular (losing to Whatsapp, Youtube, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, Linkedin, Messenger, Kwai and Pinterest). So the objective of the far-right factions working in there was to mainly shape the public opinion of Americans. Elon Musk never says anything about Brazilian law and government that a Bolsonaro supporter hadn't said before in the exact same words. The country's history with Starlink further supports the connection between Elon Musk and the far-right.

Starlink in Brazil

Starlink started it's operations in Brazil as of January of 2022. The only reason why they were able to operate here was because Bolsonaro's government interfered with Anatel (the National Telecommunications Agency) to approve the company's contract despite many irregularities. Musk promoted his company's presence in the country by saying he would bring internet access to 19 thousand schools in remote locations across the Amazon.

From March to July of this year, at least 50 Starlink antennaes were found in illegal mining operations in the Amazon. Starlink refuses to share information about their users even though they have precise data that would allow to identify and localize illegal mining activities; which is worrying because Starlink is the preferred tool of communication of the Amazon organized crime.

No schools have been connected to Starlink as of yet.

In conclusion

Twitter was the main site for many Brazilian artists to share and sell their creations, and it's suspension certainly impacts their lives. These people have the right to be upset; it's getting harder and harder to be an artist every day. But with how Twitter has been run, and it's growing support for nazi-adjacent groups and attacks against our government, I can't say that blocking Twitter was a bad thing.

What is happening to Twitter right now is just one chapter of an on-going narrative dispute, fueled by the desire of some political sections for the rise of the far-right once again. A far-right that has a lot to gain from being able to facilitate the illegal operations of logging and mining in the Amazon, and who can only get to power again by challenging the Brazilian democracy in the American public opinion.

I don't want this blog post to sound like an Alexandre de Moraes apologia. He is not a hero either and he's certainly only doing this to support his own interests; which right now just so happens to coincide with defending Brazilian sovereignty.

I'll echo the sentiments I said in a previous post and say that I hope that Brazil becomes only the first one in a wave of anti-Twitter sentiment across the globe.

something absolutely broke in me finding out that the Kohanim movement's plan for the third temple includes underground parking lol. That feels like satire. Car centric locus of national connection with the devine.

Also ahh I am concerned learning just how close to mainstream these fuckers are

Anyways yeah, anyone saying "oh Jews should be allowed to pray on the mount like Muslims can" is lying to you, they're trying to ensnare you. Their goal is to level everything there and put up a parking lot with a rigidly enforced theocratic order.

Jews should not be allowed up there until the Messiah comes and that's not fucking happening until we have peace

American extremist theocrats: We must defend the sanctity of single family zoning

Israeli extremist theocrats: The Third Temple will be built on top of an underground parking garage, of course.

You're telling me the "sound like a 'normal' person" machine hates one of the most villified dialects in the English language? How could the sound white machine do this!!!

every single time i try to sit down and write my rant about the public EV charging network, i get stuck because i want it to be a Good Blog Post, i want to cite my sources, i want to do my research. and it's fucking impossible to do so anymore. if i want to look up old tax credits for EV charger installation all i get is articles about how to apply for the credit reintroduced in 2023. it sucks. so i'm just going to write my unsourced rant with things that i've convinced myself of over the last few years of driving an EV without being able to charge at home. (if you've got corrections for me, post a comment and if i agree i'll put it up here.)

putting power in context

today i drove round trip between Seattle and Bellevue at mostly freeway speeds, averaging around 50-60 mph. my car, a kia EV6, told me i made this trip averaging 4.4 miles per kWh. if you flip that fraction around, you get 227 Wh/mi (or 141 Wh/km, which is evidently quite remarkable, particularly for highway driving; in practice on 70 mph highways it fares much closer to the EV6 numbers listed on that site).

if you ask wolfram alpha about 227 Wh it'll give you some nice real-world comparisons, like "one-fifth of the energy released by explosion of one kilogram of TNT", or "5.3 times the energy capacity of the iPad 3 battery". again this is to go one mile. trying to wrap my mind around the fact that i can cook three potatoes in my microwave (900 W @ 15 min) for the same amount of energy as it takes to drive a mile throws me for a loop every time.

every mile you drive, you have to recharge that, right? unless you like turning stupidly expensive cars into bricks? it takes a little less than 10 minutes to recharge 227 Wh on a standard household circuit, or two days to recharge my car from 20% to 80%, and that's if you have the ability to charge at home. which i don't, because i live in an apartment.

so i have gotten to know public chargers a bit over the last three years and oh man let me tell you

why do i need an app to charge my car again?

again, the internet doesn't work anymore, and i don't have time to do real research like digging through newspaper archives and the federal register, so this is conjecture working backwards from what i know.

It Seems To Me that a lot of public EV charging infrastructure in the US was incentivized by tax credits. people in the US love to avoid paying taxes however they can, so tax credits end up being a great incentive to get rich people and business owners to do things. they gave out tax credits for buying EVs and for installing EV chargers, and so businesses installed EV chargers.

but businesses aren't just gonna dole out electricity for free. public "level 2" chargers are the equivalent of running your dryer on max heat for as long as a car is parked there and charging. and because it's The Future, business owners don't want to write down meter readings and charge customers directly, and car drivers don't want to be social ever.

this sounds like a great opportunity for a middleman. But Wait, if an average charging session is going to be an hour or so, and cars can only charge at a few kW because they can't do road trips yet, you're really only billing like $2-$3 per session. if you charge a credit card each time, like 10% of that is going to your card processor. it'd be cheaper for us, and thus for customers [citation needed], if we could bill them $10 or $20 at a time and maintain an account for them. and thus the Charging Network was born

this started a system of every single public EV charger requiring a fucking app, so that you can authenticate your prepaid payment account with an internet-connected EVSE. it is tiring. on my phone i currently have five separate apps solely for starting and stopping a charger i've plugged my car into. there was one charging network i had to use sometimes where they evidently lost the ability to update their old app, so you had to intuit that maybe there was a different app with the same name that might work. and these apps are just universally frustrating garbage interfaces

imagine if you had to install an app for every different company you bought your gas from. you have to type in your fucking credit card number, no autofill, no mobile wallet support, and if you don't do it fast enough your session times out. and if you don't have their app and you're out of cellular range or your phone is dead you just can't get gas, there is no other option. this is an era that public EV charging is still in, although we're thankfully slowly on the way out of.

the economics here are changing a bit, because drive batteries in cars are getting much, Much larger, and DC fast chargers are getting much faster, so a 30-minute charge session can easily push past $10 or $20, and it becomes far more economical to just put a damn credit card reader on the charger. (tesla, unsurprisingly, still refuses to do so; i also don't think i've ever seen a chargepoint charger with a credit card terminal either, but it doesn't seem like they own any of their chargers.)

a brief aside on electrify america

personally i give credit to the invention of "put a credit card terminal on the charger" to Electrify America, one of the first companies that decided to try and build out a DC fast charging network along major freeways to compete with tesla superchargers. (not directly compete, because at the time only tesla's cars could use their chargers, and wouldn't usually have any reason to use EA's, but you get what i mean.) there is not much credit to give them, honestly, because they are the only network that started primarily with DC fast charging in mind, so they never had to consider the implications of credit card processing fees eating 15-20% of their bottom line.

EA does not exist because the free market decided we needed a DC fast charging network open to any vehicle spread out across the vast US highway system. it exists because one of the conditions of volkswagen's settlement with US regulators from their emissions cheating scandal was to spend $2 billion on building "clean-emissions infrastructure", including a public electric vehicle charging network.

i fundamentally do not believe that we would have any EV adoption in the US beyond tesla if it weren't for volkswagen teaching their cars to cheat on emissions tests.

why are all the chargers broken?

consider the humble gas pump. it has had the benefit of a century of engineering to put up with Some Shit. people drive off with the hose still in the car so often that it is designed to get yoinked off as safely as possible and be replaced as cheaply as possible. every single one is inspected by your state's board of weights and measures. i would guess that most of their core components are interchangeable and readily available.

gas pumps are also placed at gas stations, which are businesses with the primary goal of selling you gas, and a secondary goal of getting you to buy overpriced sodas and dubious hot dogs and letting you pee. they usually have someone physically present working there who you can tell if something is broken, so they can report it to the business owner so it gets fixed, and they really would like it to get fixed as soon as possible because if a line forms, they're going to lose business to the guy across the street.

an EV charger is an afterthought. it leases space on someone else's property. there is no proprietor you can talk to without spending 15 minutes on hold. the nice ones are placed at wal-marts or big grocery stores where you probably need a code to get into the bathroom, but sometimes you're just chilling in a hotel parking lot in the middle of nowhere for 45 minutes with nothing to do. usually, nobody working at the wal-mart or the hotel or the mall can do a damn thing if the charger is broken, and they don't care either, because that's not their business.

an EV charger is a bespoke proprietary machine, known only to its manufacturer, and probably obsolete within three years. parts, if available, take weeks to arrive and weeks to be installed by a qualified electrician. the plugs themselves are way more fragile than a gas pump nozzle. for some godforsaken reason half of them run a shitty java app on windows embedded. also they have really thick copper wiring in them, so people have recently taken to chopping off the cables for scrap, which is really easy to do because nobody is around to notice.

a lot of the big DC fast charger networks own their equipment and lease space to operate them, but networks like chargepoint seem to not own any chargers. instead businesses (or increasingly, state departments of transportation and local electric utilities) buy chargers from chargepoint, presumably because they have to be the owner to get the tax credit, and then become responsible for maintenance. there's a tax credit for installing new EV chargers, but none for maintaining them. what the fuck do you think is going to happen?

why does it take so long?

Batteries Are Fucking Terrible For Cars!!!!!

like i don't know. it is an incredible feat of engineering that my car can charge at 250 kW on a good day. it still takes like 20 minutes to get from 20% to 80%, and then it's slow as hell the rest of the way to 100%. there is only so much engineering you can do to batteries. and then they fucking wear out. i am fairly certain battery cars are not going to save us

i am still pretty bullish on hydrogen fuel cell cars — apparently i have been since i did a research paper on the topic in high school freshman english in 2007 — because it seems to me the only way you can avoid sitting at a charger for 30 minutes while still having an emissions-free vehicle. you can maybe do electrolysis on-site using the local grid or solar or whatever and the local water supply? (i guess this assumes a world where we won't have Water Wars in a decade or so)

but if we tried Everything, and i mean Everything, to decarbonize every vehicle in america and we still had to do it with battery cars, there's going to need to be a radical shift in how charging works. i think obviously we're going to have to figure out how to harmonize the fact that people who live in apartments sometimes need cars and they'll need to be able to charge them at home; four chargers for a 100-space garage isn't going to cut it. but we also need public charging infrastructure that understands that it takes thirty minutes to fill up a single car, and that there needs to be people working there to help customers and report (and maybe even fix!) problems.

one might imagine a small convenience store building with 15-20 fast chargers surrounding it to meet roughly the same capacity as a 4-pump gas station, but good god that is uh. probably 350 kW × 20 = 7 megawatts of potential grid load. realistically probably 5 MW tops. some napkin math using numbers from various press releases leads me to believe that a single walmart store might have a maximum load of half a megawatt during a heat wave, and in a lot of places in the US that's probably the largest continuous grid load in the area unless you've got major factories nearby.

there is the idea of putting batteries inside the EV chargers themselves, so that you can smooth out the grid load while still providing fast charging for cars. but now you're adding more precious metals to the system???

anyone who thinks this is the future, this is how we fix climate change, doesn't know what this shit is like and how bleak the future of battery EVs is. thanks for reading my TED talk