• she/her

Principal investigator at an undeserving midwestern university. I am ill-tempered and well-endowed. Beware.


I have a Cohost for art and writing!
cohost.org/lab-reports
profile pic by Xīn Jīn Mèng!
cohost.org/xinjinmeng

doctorwednesday
@doctorwednesday

I'm more fortunate than many; I don't have conflicting feelings about Rowling because I never thought her writing was any good.

I picked up the first two Harry Potter books, I think after the third book came out? and found Sorcerer's Stone to be badly written, unoriginal, tedious, patience-trying and twee. I could not see what people saw in it. I didn't even start the second book.

I was so disenchanted with Potter, in fact, there's an incident in my autobiography where I loudly take the piss out of it. I found the idea that society's rejects can look forward to being whisked away into sainted approbation and actualization 'by the expediency of a heretofore undisclosed noble birth' absolutely infuriating. Don't fight back, don't rock the boat, just close your eyes and soak up the abuse and wait for the wizards to rescue you, because you're one of the beautiful people. Arrgh. (I may have made one of my students cry. I've done that before.)

And yet, secure in my convictions, I felt a little guilty. "Goodness, Holly," I said to myself at the time, "that's awfully harsh criticism of an apparently nice person who's only trying to write whimsical books for children." And then all this happened.

Subsequently I've felt it might be better to elide the incident from my autobiography, because I don't want people getting the wrong idea, that it's a political statement rather than a critical one. It annoys me that she's made her actual writing bulletproof by clouding it in personal controversy. If only I could use that trick with my publications, I'd have a display case full of Nobels.

['Excerpt the incident here?' you ask. Maybe.]


doctorwednesday
@doctorwednesday

'You didn't loooove Harry Potter?! Obviously you're an unfeeling, soulless automaton with no wonder in your heart.' Well, duh. I work in academia!


doctorwednesday
@doctorwednesday

In fairness, Harry Potter is a very British story, where the protagonist triumphs because he's a scion of nobility and from the better sort of people; and my response to it is very American, given our national myth that any pathetic nobody can lift themselves up into greatness if only they work hard enough; and so Harry basically being Boris Johnson really chaps my ass.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @doctorwednesday's post:

in reply to @doctorwednesday's post:

Member of the middle classes learns they are secretly a member of the upper class and proceeds to vigorously up-hold the status quo is a quintessential British story. Potter might as well be Flashman.

Seriously! What do we know about Harry Potter? He's a child of wealth and nobility, obliged to live with his prole relatives b/c of a tiff between his parents and some other nobs; but then he's spirited away to his proper place of acclaim and spends seven books at a private ('public') school. And then he becomes a cop.™ Bonus points for having the grubby lower-class wizard be the one who gets his parents killed.

Being a lower-class oik myself, it really boils my piss too, for someone to see a centuries long system of inequality, decide "Yes, this systematic unfairness is good actually, and needs to be protected at all costs.", and dress it up in the robes of Wonder ond Magic...