Also the whole reason my gf googled this is because I had been listening to a podcast that talked about god’s penis (Data Over Dogma) which is hosted by two other guys named Dan
The following anecdote is told of Daniel James. [...] After a lecture on theology and the nature of god’s member, James was accosted by a little old lady named Danielle.
”Your theory that the theology of god’s penis is a topic equally interesting like any other, and penis discourse is driven by any person much like those of most topics, has a very convincing ring to it, Mr. James, but it's wrong. I've got a better theory," said the little old lady.
"And what is that, madam?" inquired James politely.
"That the discussion of god’s penis is only spread by people named Dan."
Not wishing to demolish this absurd little theory by bringing to bear the masses of evidence he had at his command, James decided to gently dissuade his opponent by making her see some of the inadequacies of her position.
”If your theory is correct, madam," he asked, "what brings that discussion out of Dan focused spaces?"
"You're a very clever man, Mr. James, and that's a very good question," replied the little old lady, "but I have an answer to it. And it's this: The first Dans are then is discussed by a second pair of Dans, who discuss God’s penis in turn."
"But who repeats this second discussion?" persisted James patiently.
To this, the little old lady crowed triumphantly,
"It's no use, Mr. James—it's Dans all the way down."
