this site has two programmers

 

dorky femme droid

eggbug enthusiast

important eggbug lore

 


 

if you use the phrase "be normal" as if it's something to aspire to, kindly take a long walk off a short plank. or block me. whichever is easier for you.

 


 

child of the 80s

 


 

i escaped a cult.
all of the content warnings.
all of them.
tag: exerian's tragic backstory

 


 

                                 
eggbug bounce 88x31An 88x31 button advertising Cohost: "no ads. no tracking. yes eggbug."get firefox
   
                                                       
  

lexyeevee
@lexyeevee

i just went to the first MDN page in my address bar history, which is for the grid property, and hit "AI Explain" on the first code block i saw, which is the overview of property syntax

the code block starts like this:

/* <'grid-template'> values */
grid: none;
grid: "a" 100px "b" 1fr;
grid: [linename1] "a" 100px [linename2];

and the explanation starts like this:

The given code example demonstrates various values and combinations that can be used with the grid property in CSS.

The first set of examples shows different values for the grid property. Each value represents a different grid template. Here are the explanations for each example:

  1. grid: none;: This value sets the grid to have no explicit grid template.

  2. grid: "a" 100px "b" 1fr;: This value sets the grid template to have two rows and two columns. The first row has a height of 100 pixels and the second row has a height of 1 fraction unit (1fr). The columns are named "a" and "b".

NOPE. critically but subtly wrong! this creates a grid with two rows with heights 100px and 1fr, one column, and two areas named "a" and "b". (and as smaller quibbles: rows and columns do not have names at all in css grid; only areas and lines do. and calling "fr" a "fraction unit" is kind of weird.)

it continues in this vein and misunderstands the syntax several more times, but then gets a few of them right as well, and all written in the same objective tone.

i mean i knew this is how it works but it really fucking sucks to see in action. and of course it's the more subtle stuff, the stuff that people are more likely to click the explain button on, that will come out wrong.

i just hate this man. i hate that everyone is falling all over themselves to make a button that produces confident human-like text that's completely fucking wrong. as if no one cares if it's wrong, no one even cares to point out that it's often wrong, everyone is just delighted that it produces something. what the fuck are we doing? what the hell is wrong with this industry?


edit: THEY CALL IT "YOUR TRUSTED COMPANION"



You must log in to comment.

in reply to @bcj's post:

honestly MDN has been bad / going downhill for years, they keep making the site Worse and most of the information is mildly outdated at this point

in reply to @lexyeevee's post:

i'm literally doing the openai intro developers courses right now and can't believe how blasé they are to their system just being wrong. they're working through a customer service chatbot for a tech retailer in one example and at one point it recommends a soundbar instead of the tv requested and the presenter just goes "oh huh, maybe that would be better with GPT-4" and moves on!

right now i'm on the section about evaluating how well your LLM system works and he basically says "well if it's not life-or-death you're allowed to do a bad job on this"

lol. at least you have to register/log in first before you get to play with it, imagine if they put this in front of everyone right off the bat

can't wait to find out what else it is completely wrong about

uuuughhhhh i did a quick look at the page and didn't see it at first and thought it was under the "ai help" tab

i gave up on using f3 to search websites because between lazy loading and chrome being dogshit it often just doesn't work

I can't remember which chost I commented on last time sorry

There was a press release today and part of it was "LOOK AT THE FEEDBACK WE GOT! MOST OF OUR USERS LOVE IT!" and god damn metrics are a fucking scam. Not going to consider when the prompt was put and potential bias for people actually willing to submit that feedback? Nope, users must love it based on this one cherry picked fact.

Is it going to be forked?