flashfennec

Discord: flashfennec

  • he/her/they

A neon fennec lives here. It will never stop posting. We have asked it to stop.


I'm no longer a religious person, but the habit of looking for patterns in the weave of the universe remains. Sometimes I find myself looking back at old writings religious and otherwise for little nuggets of understanding that may have been lost, ignored or misunderstood.

Our ancestors were no mental slouches, so I feel like there might be a few kernels of insight scattered throughout the world's theologies - that either in art or in writing, people may have actually gotten a glimpse at the intent churning beneath the hood of the universe.

For example, I see an interesting through-line in the christian bible's book of genesis. Humanity exchanges the gift of life for the gift of knowledge and, having expanded and unified beneath a single language, we very nearly complete the tower of babel prior to god's intervention.

And then again later on, god goes absolutely apeshit on the nephilim when they emerge - you could rightly say that the single most consistent aspect of the christian god's character is that he detests anything capable of elevating humanity closer to his state of wholeness and perpetuity.

So my big dumb pattern-seeking brain looks at the emergence of AI along with the ultimate shattering of the language barrier to follow and it wonders - is there something here? Are we banging on the glass and about to break through? Were the authors of those stories using fiction to contextualize some deep insight they'd gained?

I suppose this type of thinking serves no purpose. I've no faith to bolster and I certainly won't be making any great discoveries in this lifetime. Still, it gives my brain something to do in the late hours.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @flashfennec's post:

I think mythology is really replete with stories of how reaching too high burns you, even outside Christianity. Icarus is the famous one, but just about every mythological figure who reaches for unique greatness or immortality meets a bad end.

I'd caution against reading too much into this, though - whenever historical figures tried to exceed the bounds of their petty little reality, they'd do it through weird astrological, alchemical means and generally die of mercury poisoning. After a while, I think people would learn that everyone who attempted this generally got fucked up, and begin to weave it into myths, but I don't know if I'd call it a universal truth. It's more just a sign that our understanding of the world wasn't at the level where we could hope to achieve the things they wanted to achieve.

Icarus is a perfect example here, actually: If your goal is to soar through the air in 400BC, you're kinda shit out of luck - you need like ten paradigm shifts in your understanding of physics and aerodynamics before you can even ask the right questions. There's no way you'll be able to push science that far in your lifetime. If your goal is to fly in 2023AD, those shifts have happened, and so you buy a ticket and board the next flight. It's not monumental hubris anymore. Flying through the air didn't melt our wings.

I’m speaking as much of a fundamental expansion of understanding and capability as I am of the potential risks. I see the tower and what made it being rebuilt, so to speak, in the form of AI.

And from what I can tell, there’s nobody around to stop it this time.