A very common mistake I see a lot of engineering teams make is say something along the lines of "If we create this framework X then the less technical users of this framework will be able to thoughtlessly churn out a bunch of code in this framework and it will be great and there won't be any problems and we move onto the next project". This literally never works out (at least, not in the way that people think it will).
In the best case scenario, your users will churn out a large amount of code using your framework (which is exactly the outcome you hoped for!) and that huge amount of code will push the boundaries of what your framework is capable of (like performance, compilation speed, or features). The larger your user base is the greater the demand will be to improve your framework in a myriad of ways.
In the worst case scenario your users will find increasingly inane ways to do things wrong with your framework despite your best efforts and you will be expected to clean up their mess because you very likely sold the project to management on the premise of "our users are not going to have to think".
… and this process will literally never end; the project will never be in a "done state" and require permanent staffing.
Personally, I'm fairly "anti-framework" by default because in my experience most frameworks are essentially software engineering organizations attempting to "launder" skilled labor as unskilled labor. Software engineering organizations like to pretend that they can somehow make productive use of a large pool of unskilled labor (less technical users in this case) but in reality this pool of unskilled labor will quickly become blocked without continuous assistance from a pool of skilled labor (engineers supporting the framework in this case).
I do think there are some situations where this skilled/unskilled labor division makes sense, but typically not on the scale of a software engineering organization. I personally only think on the scale of an open source ecosystem do you get enough of an economy of scale that this sort of divide can pay off.
