… is that you only need to administer one technical interview and one non-technical interview (each no more than an hour long).
In my opinion, any interview process longer than that is not only unnecessary but counterproductive.
Obviously, this streamlined interview process is easier and less time-consuming to administer, but there are other benefits that might not be obvious.
the funniest part about the comments on social media is that half the replies are "this is not a spicy take at all" and the other half are "you're naive OP"
there was one insightful thing i learned from reading the comments, though:
quite a few people pointed out that prevailing interviewing practices assume that all interviewers are created (roughly) equal, but a commonly cited improvement to the interviewing process is to recognize that some people are good interviewers and some people are bad interviewers and to only let the good interviewers administer interviewers
