I'm Frankie, I play TTRPGs too much. I will be reblogging and/or posting a lot of furry arte and some of that's going to be kink stuff so heads up
AKA Nerts but that's going back a while


nicky
@nicky

genuine question btw. i can't figure out the deal with capital f Fandom as a lifestyle. it's baffling to me. i'm a fan of things but identifying as being in the xyz fandom and performing acts of fandom is weird to me. it seems to get in the way of truly engaging with the art/media/whatever, but maybe i'm off base with this idk


irisjaycomics
@irisjaycomics

KIND ANSWER:

people are social creatures, but it's hard to make friends unless your brain is shaped a certain way. many people find it nice to have a shared interest that gives you a conversational inroad with others, and even a sense of shared identity within a group. it can also be fun to compare and contrast in-depth analyses and opinions on the same piece of source material by others with a wide range of backgrounds. in essence, it is art transformed into community, often resulting in more art created as a byproduct. it allows people who wouldn't normally think of themselves as artists, critics or social people to engage with those aspects of themselves in a space that understands. it's neat!

PISSY ANSWER:

consuming media is an easy substitute for doing interesting or constructive things with your life. it's what capitalism uses to keep us from noticing we're all meat for the grinder, and in our modern times media companies try to foster an attitude of hyper-obsession over their properties to keep us guzzling from their content teats. toxic fandom culture is when people recognize something's wrong with the world, but they decide it's easier and/or more personally satisfying to strangle the piglet on the next titty over rather than kill the source of the milk

MY ACTUAL GUESS:

i think most people just kind of need to be a little totally ghoul-mode bugfuck about something in order to survive nowadays. fandom is one method of doing it. whether that manifests positively or negatively is Up To Them


chirasul
@chirasul

CHIRASUL ANSWER

capitalism has absorbed + replaced culture, and the community involvement it provides, to the point where you cannot really find it outside of capitalism (including fandom) or a religious institution. and in a lot of ways, fandoms provide kind of the exact same things as a religious institution. let's break it down:

church is popular because it provides for these intrinsic human needs:

  • community: i can go to church and meet people! and they usually want to meet me, too! that is, all else accounted for, kind of nice
  • the Rules: not only does everyone have an intrinsic need to know that they're Doing the Right Thing, but they gotta know what The Right Thing is, and they want to meet people who believe in the same Right Things as them
  • purpose: why am i alive? why do i exist? what's a larger reason why I'm alive? how can i grow as a person? church provides this robustly - few institutions come close to addressing this human need

now, let's compare that to fandom [EDIT: btw i'm talking primarily about fandoms based on a corporate controlled media property. not, like, the furry fandom, necessarily. that's a different post]. does fandom meet these needs? kinda!

  • community: being in a fandom instantly connects you with people who have at least one shared interest, and by the nature of the fandom, constant creative output from either the media source or from other users means they're always new pieces of culture to experience and share. community is fandom's strongest aspect
  • the Rules: here's where it gets interesting! fandoms can vary wildly based on what kind of values the members share. what tends to happen is that a fandom based on a media with the broadest possible appeal will also have the broadest range of shared values. media with a very specific audience will often have fans with a more consistent shared sense of values. and yes, people treat media much like a holy text in the sense that they extract and interpret ethical values from it! humans have done this for all of history, and they will keep doing it forever. for better or for worse.
  • purpose: wild card! the purpose of a fandom within the context of capitalism is to consume the content and support the media. if you do not do these things, you are an outlier in the fandom! this purpose essentially defines your membership within the fandom. culture becomes something you buy and wear. membership is based on whether or not you have purchased.

[EDIT forgot to say why this makes fandom Like That.] because fandom is based on consuming media and not, like, some overarching human connection or purpose, media consumption is designed to just shove a bunch of people (primarily, and by design, people who otherwise have no other stronger community, Rules, or sense of purpose, hence why they are looking to meet those needs within the context of fandom) together into a box and encourages them to express their feelings at maximum volume as a kind of walking talking advertisement in support of the Content. capitalist media loves nothing more than a very vocal and passionate fan! no bad publicity baby let's get dramatic and emotional!!

hmm, that sucks. is there a way to fix this?

sure! media needs to be able to exist outside of capitalism. the intent of the media needs to have some purpose more important than "trap users into a spending cycle". that can be a lot of things! it can be things like:

  • share the experiences of real people!
  • explore the human condition!
  • imagine what the future might be like!
  • challenge the viewer's preconceived notions and/or sensibilities!
  • whatever else!

you know where you can get those three human needs met outside of a fandom? there's lots of places! some popular places to interface with culture in a way that meets those needs without necessarily conforming to the desires of capitalism are:

  • local political orgs!
  • local book clubs!
  • the fucking Library!
  • local hobby groups!!!
  • local arts and crafts groups!
  • local volunteer work!
  • local zine clubs!

you'll noticed i used the word "local" a lot yeah that's because the anthithesis to capitalism is to find people around you living under the same conditions as you and to find fellowship with them and do things with them that aren't based on consuming a piece of media released by a corporation. yeah, it takes more work and effort and vulnerability to do that than consuming a piece of media, which is essentially riskless. corporations are counting on that! unfortunately, good things require taking risks and inconveniencing yourself a little. you might even have to be around people who annoy you sometime - dont worry, that is not a bad thing!

i'm sorry that things keep coming back around to "it's capitalism" but i'm afraid that's just kinda the umbrella under which we all are operating. but if we stick together and do things that aren't dependent on spending money on product, things get better, a LOT better, measurably better, both personally and communally!!!

fun addendum: you know what else i've noticed provides for those three human needs? online group environments like forums or discord servers! rules, community, and more or less purpose. no wonder churches are hemorrhaging attendees these days.


fwankie
@fwankie

Hot take but furry is a subculture, not a fandom (despite the name)


fwankie
@fwankie

not that that means we don't end up doing unhinged fandom drama, but it plays out different since there's no central thing all furries agree they're part of


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @nicky's post:

I have no idea. Sometimes I feel like I am part of the problem. Other times I feel like everyone is against me.
Like, one of my fundamental beliefs is "I am one of them", which is to say, I am no different than other human, there is nothing special about me except in the ways everyone is special. And yet, I keep feeling like: the larger a fandom is, the more hostile it is, that the way people approach Lore is bad, and that a lot of meme are ugly and disgusting. But like, why do I feel left out? I am one of them!
The more I hang out in fandom, the more I feel like my opinion are wrong, my conclusion incorrect, what I thought was objective is subjective and that the gap of communication between each other is truly vast. Those are not inherently bad things, sometimes I do get my head up my ass, but other times I feel stressed just hanging out with in those Discords.
I don't know. I don't leave fandoms because like, who is going to listen to my rants about Fallen London and how the Great Chain of Being in that universe related to the same concept in ours, and what the difference between the two reveal the thematic underpinning of the game? And some people are cool. If anybody, it's going to be in fandom. But man, I really don't like it there.

Start a blog or something where you write down your thoughts on these media and like, a little discord or forum or something. The Whole Fandom is unwieldy and annoying, you gotta find the folks you vibe with and who are fun to talk to.

not directly related to the main point but, i do, i want to listen to that so badly holy shit

my own thoughts on it are sorta loose and not super well-formed, but, the great chain, the narrative role of the liberation of night, the relation to irl victorian history and colonial power dynamics, and like, FL's relation to the steampunk/victorian gothic genre in general, it all Activates something in my brain and i want to hear someone rant about it

when you interact with a work with hobby levels of time, you get invested.

when people with low perspective do that they tend to think there needs to be a way the metawork goes, if unconsciously

when enough people do it, they start driving out people with more perspective than them.

it's not fandom, ime. it's anything that's onboarding and etiquette mechanisms can't keep up with the second order Endless September the iPhone ushered in with everyone having access without much priming, for better and worse.

because the only strategy for picking up ettequette that works is lurking, but if you lurk to learn, the most active posters are always the newest. so they're often learning from the people without any community history, thinking it's deep lore.

it used to be different. I'm not sure it could have stayed even if people knew. a big part of it is people not seeing mods and mentors as having reasons for saying things, or their labor as valuable (and digital labor alienation is rife across all perspective brackets, don't get me wrong). and ofc it depends on the fandom.

but there were a lot less people raised in white suburbs who don't realize their normal was shaped by evangelicals.

honestly, i think it's like any other hobby, in that you're going to have people who are mostly just having a good time writing their little fics and drawing their little arts and collecting things, and then also some people are just going to be weird toxic freaks about it, and unfortunately their bad behavior is what draws attention to the whole thing for a lot of people. i think it must be similar to how i feel about most sports. i can't fathom having enough interest in them to, say, start a riot, and i assume that doesn't really represent the majority of sports fans but as an outsider it's hard to parse LOL

This is why the classification of furry as a 'fandom' is always a bit weird to me. I think there is certainly a segment of furry activity that is about collecting books by your favorite furry author or art prints by your favorite artist or whatever, but a whole lot more of it is people painstakingly crafting their own persona in a very queer and almost spiritual way, for some. Like, a lot of furry is people realizing who they in fact are, and finding ways to express that true self to others. I think for a lot of people their fursona is on the same level or importance as their gender in terms of how much it represents who they are

I don't really have any awareness of most other fandoms, like ones oriented around specific brands or media, in terms of how they engage with that like.. identity/spiritual aspect that I think furry genuinely has. Like are people out here figuring out who they are deep down because they saw the latest marvel movie? Maybe some, I just don't get it if so.

I feel like the thing with "furry fandom" is that other fandoms were kind of more like furry at the time the term was coined. Looking at the sci-fi and fantasy fandoms in the late 70s/early 80s, they had a lot more of a focus on creativity in addition to being based around specific products; early furry fandom zines/APAs/etc. look a lot like the sci-fi and fantasy fandom ones at the time.

I suspect a large part of this is the one-two punch of the intertwining of art with capitalism and the totalising, alienating force of capitalism in our lives.

For most people, meaningfully interacting with the people who make the bulk of their art is all but impossible, and for popular (in the sense of having a lot of fans) artists, meaningfully interacting with the bulk of people who appreciate their art is also impossible.

In order to facilitate the having of lots of fans, the relationship between artist and fan has to be reduced to a money relation, to payment for content.

The problem with this, of course, is that content is the artistic equivalent of empty calories. It'll fill time, sure, it'll engage the senses, but it's limited by its role as product and commodity — content is for everyone, so it must be for nobody.

Enter The Fandom.

With the artist unavailable for participation, the next best thing is The Fandom. Whether a subreddit or a fan club, The Fandom becomes a surrogate for the artist, a community of real people that can actually be interacted with to engage with art beyond a surface level, actual people with (alleged) knowledge of The Themes and The Meanings of the art.

This, naturally, has the problems we're familiar with. When art is reduced to content, part of the process is having the edges sanded off. Content in large part becomes inkblot tests, half-formed images upon which the fan imposes their own meaning, creating an obvious contradiction — The Fandom, as a surrogate for the artist, requires orthodoxy; content, its messages weakened by endless committees and focus groups, breeds heterodoxy.

Acts of fandom, then, become purity tests and sigils of inclusion. Shaping participation in The Fandom into proscribed acts allows The Fandom to paper over the heterodoxy. After all, if two people have the same tattoo, for example, it ceases to matter if they believe the tattoo represents the same thing for both of them.

They both get to pretend it does, they get to believe they are seen and to believe they see in return, they get to feel kinship.

They get The Fandom.

I think the key point is that it is an entirely different way of engaging with the media, and in fact, is its own entirely separate hobby from the original thing. As a teen I liked reading books, and I liked being in the fandom of certain books, but they filled different niches in my life. (These days I hardly ever read new books because I no longer have the "bored at school" niche to fill. Still love being in fandoms though.)

It might just be the kind of thing that only makes sense to the people who love it, like jogging for fun. It makes perfect sense to me - as a kid I defined myself by my media "obsessions", and I was overjoyed when I found the right part of the internet and realized that there were other people out there who enjoyed not just reading Warrior Cats, but roleplaying it, and daydreaming about it, and drawing the characters, and dressing up as them, and making up their own to write stories about. If you're filled to bursting with thoughts about a media (or a specific character or ship or trope or whatever), and it's the only thing you want to draw or write or talk about, it's a relief to find other people who will share that excitement with you rather than just tolerate it. But if you don't share that excitement then it is probably exhausting and odd and difficult to tolerate!

I think a lot of hobbies and interests end up with a casual tier and a weirdly fixated tier, which sometimes look similar to each other and sometimes look extremely different. There's occasional mending and tailoring, and there's having a spare room full of fabrics and threads and sewing notions. There's owning a cat, and there's collecting stickers and knickknacks that declare you a cat-lover. There's playing video games, and there's dedicating yourself to speedrunning one game very well.

I think that one's a pretty good comparison, actually - you may decide to speedrun a game for the same reasons many people enjoy playing it casually (innovative UI, interesting items, beautiful music, etc), or other, weirder reasons (not too much RNG, spectacular glitches, etc). You might speedrun a game because you've always loved it, or you might have only picked it up because you heard it was fun to speedrun. The way you're playing it prevents you from playing it normally - but it's a way that's fun and satisfying for you. Your opinions on the game may end up sounding super weird to people who aren't approaching it from the same PoV. You know it inside and out, yet, you're out of touch with the average fan and even the creator's intentions. The general balance of online conversation around the game may start to skew towards speedrunning it, just because who else is going to be talking about the same game, over and over, for years, a decade after it was released? But it's actually a rather small percentage of the people who play the game who choose to engage with it like this – a small percentage that forms a dedicated community. And that community evolves its own etiquettes and trends.

Overall... I just think it's fun smooshing familiar characters into new outfits and new relationships and new roles and situations and universes! Especially if other people are smooshing around with me too, so there's more ideas to play with. "How would x be different if y happened" or "if x did y, how would they do it" sorts of questions are very entertaining to me, and I like to read/write/draw/look/chat about the possible answers. (It also doesn't hurt that I've got that autistic "why would I switch to a new thing when I can keep enjoying the old familiar thing", but choosing to further my enjoyment through fandom remixes rather than simply rereading is personal taste.)

people find things that they get so invested in that it becomes a core part of their identity, and our current arc of humanity is very obsessed with Identity, whether it be having it or not having it. fandoms serve as community spaces specifically for media and entertainment, which on its own is already incredibly influential to shaping how we think and act, but works on an even grander scale when many people come together to discuss this aspect of their identity. and of course, the worse you feel about your life outside of your chosen identity, the more hostile and aggressive you become about defending and praising this thing that matters to you so much.

naturally, this kind of tunnel vision combined with the community aspect leads to a very different and very warped sense of human identity (and community) that creates an almost tribal sense of defensiveness towards this small thing that has become Very Integral for this group of individuals.

human beings do this with everything -- fandoms just make you realize how ridiculous we are as a species.

in reply to @chirasul's post:

it's weird. i feel separated from fandom culture because i see people who care so much about good vibes and comfort characters and so on and so forth but ive never felt as if ive had any of those because it simply doesn't consume my life. i like things. i like things enough to write fanfic about them for fuck's sake. i just can't be in a fandom because i can't DEVOTE myself to A Thing without feeling like im giving up some self-determination.

I think a lot of it is also that since it's based on something that can just be like, dropped, there's no real threat of being Like That, either they win, or nothing happens because there's no actual reasonable mechanism for negative consequences that aren't just 'you don't get to talk to one segment of your media tastes anymore'

The other thing I notice about fandoms that can make them sort of gross to normal content enjoyers is they are almost entirely character focused. Almost every fandom views their chosen work as a source of characters to love as opposed to a piece of fiction with themes worth understanding.

Grappling with themes is something I think requires range of taste. Most stories have a limited number of them and being conceptual there’s more to learn through various points of view (in other words, trying other things). Characters however can very easily be morphed into an eternal companion or a pillar for content themselves.

Fandom is not simply a sense of community with other fans. It is a sense of community with characters. It is rules set by a character’s values. And purpose through devotion. It is a parasocial engine for fictional beings. Love and obsession for people who aren’t there and are less likely to hurt you. And if they do something you don’t like, it’s easy to say the writer got them wrong. This is the blorbo machine.