Question: did staff explain their reasoning for initially making an exception for cub? Not looking to get in an argument, just haven't seen such and am wondering about their rationale
animal lady on the world wide web
- she/her/hers
- goatygoats.com/
queer furry tiger/goat/cat lady from new york, USA, who likes Adult Content.
in love with @meaters!
linux makes me cum!
proudly autistic atheist
don't crap ya pants if i add alt text to your post!
GoatyGoats.com
goatygoats.com/non-saucy art
cohost.org/GoatyGoatssaucy art
cohost.org/LatexComplexpersonal fedi (glitch)
meow.social/@goatyart fedi (pixelfed)
pixelfed.furryfandom.me/goatyYou must log in to comment.
in reply to @goaty's post:
i think they did but it might have been edited over?
i'll see if it got snapshotted.
good lord the archive snapshot likes to just go to a blank page after ten seconds for some reason
I'll have to look at this when I'm on my computer cause the archive version just blanks out after I scroll down
It does it on my computer too, i think there's some script that's not getting killed on the page.
I had to use the "print page" hotkey to get something legible.
link to that
mhm! it appears that when staff did their edits, they made sure their edits were visible w/strikeout and commentary, so the original work is still in there but annotated