gosokkyu

エンド

  • 戦う人間発電所

owatte shimatta


renkotsuban
@renkotsuban
Sorry! This post has been deleted by its original author.

gosokkyu
@gosokkyu

GI.biz touched on this a minute ago: not only the fact that all these sites are permanently indebted to the whims of SEO but that the future of many of them is entirely dependent on a very small pool of hit games, and if those hits don't come (or don't come at the right time, or are released by publishers who are indifferent to assisting you in producing timely Content) then they're completely fucked: https://www.gamesindustry.biz/starfield-review-controversy-traces-game-journalisms-orbital-decay-this-week-in-business

I do wonder what a lot of these sites might look like if their owners would get out of the way of the people they employ, but there are a lot of people who've worked in that sector for decades who've only ever vaguely gestured in the direction of progress by way of perfunctory once-every-so-often "gee I think this industry might not be conducive to meaningful critique" pieces. and as long as those people are still around, or too scared for their career to agitate for change, I'd almost rather these sites just implode.

that or I can just go on not reading them, same as everyone else


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @gosokkyu's post:

Ooh I didn't see this GI Biz article, though yeah it makes sense how much these sites are banking on Starfield keeping them going. Looking at their front pages, it looks like they're on goddamn life support, jfc.

It's very sad but writing about videogames doesn't make enough money to employ people anymore and we're down to this. I've seen too many good and reputable sites either go bankrupt or be turned into content farms after genuinely trying everything to stay afloat while allowing people to write professionally. The selling to new owners was often a last resort because they were just constantly losing money. It became unsustainable to run such websites when ad revenue crashed and not enough people are willing to adhere to a subscription model for quality content.
It seems like websites will phase out much like the press did a decade before in favor of I guess content farms or individuals doing their thing on social media either as a hobby or as influencers being sponsored by the very companies whose products they review and not being very explicit about it.