gretchenleigh

middle-aged multimedia queer

Gretchen
The PlayStation Experiment | Game Mag Print Ads | Rando Chrontendo
software engineer @ Internet Archive
anarcho-left
trans lesbian 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️


dog
@dog

exA Arcadia, a niche arcade publisher who's controversial for their "no home ports" policy, is in the news for a weird dispute: two different companies seem to be claiming to have the license for the same game and are fighting over it.

The short version is - this was a freeware fighting game, and a small company called Eigomanga gave it an English Steam release back in 2014. Then at this year's Evo Japan, exA announces a new arcade-exclusive update, and both companies start issuing takedowns to each other. Sure not clear what rights Eigomanga think they have.

The real twist is that exA don't actually have access to the original dev - according to their site this was licensed under Japan's orphan works law, which means they failed to get in touch with the owner and instead licensed it through the Ministry of Culture. Which is a weird extra wrinkle in the whole thing. It's not the only recent game they're rereleasing that way, too - their new version of Air Gallet was licensed that way.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @dog's post:

Japan has an orphan works law which allows you to license an in-copyright work where the author can't be located by applying to the ministry of culture. The idea is that if the owner turns up later, they can be paid.

I don't think it gives you exclusive rights, except over the new parts they're making for the new version. It sounds like the argument is more that Eigomanga seem(?) to think they bought distribution rights from the developer and exA think they didn't? I guess? It's all very weird

No, most of those are actually licensed directly from the current owners. I’m assuming it’s just that those are games where the license is cheap. The only other game I remember seeing the orphan works declaration on their website is Air Gallet.