hi im moose/erasmus


Sullivan
@Sullivan

Are they serious? The idea that strangers could GUESS your @... and the chilling truth that this may indeed be the point. Discord, a CHAT service, adding social media “discoverability” shit into their app…maybe a timeline? doesn’t it make you mad?? Doesnt it piss you off??When are we going to start making bombs?

Imagining a moment in Demolition Man where stallone gets unfrozen and is handed like, a cell phone. It has a list of phone numbers like he expects, but also a "discover tab" where you can just call a random person whose phone number is trending today.

I love how ‘Social Media’ as an industry has been taking the project of the Internet, IE "All people should be able to connect to each other and have access to goods and services they want/need" (itself a notion with a few red flags, but hey fuck it why not) and advancing it into "all people should be MADE to connect to ALL other people, and the goods and services should have constant access to them at all times" just flattening everything from an at-will community into a philosopher's stone from Fullmetal Alchemist of roiling conflict and anguish, all while Brands hurl bull SHIT down at us from the top of the pit.

I remember something Twitter's “Jack” said somewhere about how his dream was always to make twitter ‘a global conversation’, like a GLOBAL…CONVERSATION. He was talking about some policy they implemented like the discover tab or not blocking nazis, and something clicked in my head like... these tech people really do think that they can annihilate the very concept of Context. As if these little doodads on the internet can actually Solve human interaction to a permanent end. Turns out the solution to our growing sense of alienation in the 21st century was just that we weren’t all in the same bucket.

This is why social media is so profitable. Its like the crux of neoliberal thought made manifest in every person's pocket all the time. It’s founded on utopian egalitarian principles but is actually really stupid and doesn't really democratize anything as much as it makes strangers fight (which IS fun to watch tbh) and actively resists the formation of resilient communities. Social Media only gets so far as a product because it's a perfect for investors: Nothing means anything and you have no privacy, but don't worry because we’re turning the wasteland into an ad space killing field.

And every system that starts out okay has to eventually be molded into this formula. Even DISCORD. Nothing can exist unless more value can be extracted from it and replaced with cardboard. Netflix Battlepass. And the guys running it always think it will really add to our user experience! Its like if the manhattan project got started because Oppenheimer believed that nukes would help people scrub barnacles off the bottoms of their boats.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @Sullivan's post:

i cannot tell if this is satire or if you are genuinely comparing discord making it easier to share usernames between friends to the development of the atomic bomb.

an experienced sysadmin i met recently tried sharing her username with me, who has been on the internet personally and professionally since 1996, and we had trouble resolving it and had to use a side channel to error correct. that seems like something that should be fixed.

Well yes, but there are way better alternate ways for doing that without opening up the flood gates. Sharing a QR code (something discord logins already do!), making friend invite quick links (Steam does this one), to name a few.

As it stands, I have always appreciated being accessible on discord but not easily discoverable. I use it specifically for friends and groups that I care to talk to. I know some people who would probably want to find me, but I don't want them to. It's a small shift in my privacy and it bothers me.

where in the release does it describe an affordance that would compromise your privacy in any way? afaik there is no public index of users and no plan for one.

i'm still pretty flabbergasted that you'd compare those two things.

Because they will be unique to each user, new usernames will make it easier to identify and connect with your friends. Your new username will be unique to you, so share it with your friends when you want them to connect with you.

AKA if I have a handle here that matches discord (I do, except for the numerical ending) then anyone can simply put into discord to search for me. If I can opt out of being discoverable then that would be fine.

Because new usernames are unique to each user, they primarily serve as unique identifiers for friend requests and for validating the identity of other users on Discord.

You can type either format of usernames in the friend request flow to add new friends.

It's always been more or less a public index. The search has always been public. The functionality is changing in such a way where you could effectively take a handle someone just plain uses on other social media and add them. It's the implied, emergent functionality here. The alphanumerical hash at the end just prevented you from doing that.

I really don't understand how this is normatively different from a private twitter account, or even a private account on Cohost. But I'm going to leave this conversation because this doesn't seem productive for either of us.