jaidamack

AV by @distressedegg

  • they/them

🔞 I say lots of heck words and post questionable smut. Stick around if that's your thing, but if you're below legal age to view such things in your jurisdiction, kindly go someplace else.
🚜 Bob Semple was right.


feybeasts
@feybeasts

I’m the “Grumman made mail trucks and from a societal impact perspective, they’re more useful than the F-14 ever was” kinda military historian.

People don’t like that kind of military historian.


feybeasts
@feybeasts

I’m also a “the only thing the german military industrial complex produced of note in WWII was this” kinda military historian.


fwankie
@fwankie

Yeah, if you go by how fast everyone else stole a design, by far the greatest german invention of either world war


Zuthal
@Zuthal

the one other nazi military design that you could argue really was high quality (because people kept using it well after the war) is the MG 42

several NATO countries, including Germany, still use what is basically an MG 42 redesigned for 7.62x51 as their general purpose machine gun


fwankie
@fwankie

Yeah but you could have mechanised infantry without a machine gun a lot easier than you could without jerry cans


jaidamack
@jaidamack

"Sepp. Was meinst du, ha? We have no Sonderkraftfahrzeuge... we don't have enough trucks... we barely have horses to pull artillery!"
"Ja, ja, Dieter. Ich weiss, man, sure sure. I get it."
"So why for have you all these divisions called Panzergrenadiere?"
"Hitler said-"
"Oh, fuck."
"Hitler said that they're Panzergrenadier divisions and that means they're mounted in armoured vehicles. Mechanized infantry!"
"Mechanized? Mit was, bitte?"
"...boots?"
"Ja und?"
"...bicycles?"
"We haven't even stolen enough bikes from the Dutch to make that happen!"

And so roughly 10% of anything called a 'mechanized division' in the German Heer around 1944 was actually sent into battle with an engine more complex than two feet and tired legs.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @fwankie's post: