knightly

A queer linux admin that goes "mow"

One of those furries that makes the internets go.
Loves to argue politics, but sometimes doesn't know when to quit.


modulusshift
@modulusshift

I know, we got a fairly rosy financial update, with positive net income (wow!) But cohost isn't out of the woods yet! A lot of that income was from yearly subs, if you compare the Monthly Recurring Revenue with the Expenses, we're still looking at a little over $12k/month burn rate, which means things still aren't looking so rosy a couple months out. And besides, when we do manage to break even consistently, that just means that we need to give them room to hire another staff member to help develop the site! :eggbug-smile-hearts:

so sub to cohost Plus! we're so close to proving you can run a site like this on the worker co-op model with market wages! rub it in those skeptical fedi faces who say "well why don't you just do almost two full time jobs worth of labor for free? you idiots". our staff members do two full time jobs worth of labor for the price of one, maybe one and a half! (we really need more staff lol pls help us our staff is dying)


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @modulusshift's post:

It's important to note that Plus! subs are likely only ever going to be a stopgap measure and are unlikely to cover the full balance of the site's monthly expenses unless (until?) there are more large influxes of active users - Cohost is ALREADY converting active users to paying users to a degree that other freemium service providers would sacrifice their firstborn to achieve, the problem is that there aren't ENOUGH users (yet) for that to translate into sustainability.

What these bumps in monthly revenue do is allow @staff to reduce the amount of debt they take on from their funder while they develop new user-retention and revenue-generation features (and while they wait for the userbase to grow). Which isn't nothing! When you're roughly half a million dollars in debt with interest accruing, it's very prudent to want that number to go up as little as possible! These revenue bumps are also a great proof-of-concept for the funder and probably make them feel very confident in their investment. However, @staff have said multiple times that there's really nothing at this point stopping them from securing more cash from the funder other than their own reluctance to take on more debt than they have to. The money's there when they need it, which isn't quite the same thing as the site being in dire straits & in danger of shutting down if subs don't increase.

For what it's worth, I think sustainability is probably not too far off - Twitter keeps teetering (I imagine the site will see another influx of users around the time Tweetdeck goes Blue-only in a few weeks), Tumblr is making theatening noises, and the site's profile has never been higher as a potential New Destination. User subscriptions are going to be a real money-spinner when they're implemented, since "Patreon/Onlyfans but with an actual functional social network attached" is kind of a revenue wet dream. The main thing that @staff and the site need is time. Which they've got!

yeah I'm not trying to be doomer about it, it's clear to me at least that cohost is actually pretty stable at the moment. we're looking at a needle swinging back and forth at the border of a warning zone, but the danger zone is still a safe distance away. but I really would like staff to have the room to do more. take on debt with the confidence they'll be able to pay it back, for example, instead of doing their best to squirm out from under a pile of it hoping they can limp along with less. and if running occasional Plus! drives inches them closer to that future, I want to do it. I'm gonna double up when my yearly expires in a couple weeks, for sure