lexyeevee

troublesome fox girl

hello i like to make video games and stuff and also have a good time on the computer. look @ my pinned for some of the video games and things. sometimes i am horny on @squishfox


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @lexyeevee's post:

maybe?

tbqh, I think that "this person did a thing that hurt and bewildered me at the time, and still stings, especially because I find it hard to reconcile with where their understanding of the general problem has obviously ended up" is a pretty gentle way of naming names, and I also think that when I read the problem stated like that it seems hopeful that you might have a genuine reconciliation. people grow their way out of old, rigid mindsets, and part of having a resilient rather than fragile community is being willing to mend the wrongs one did when one's mindset was rigid or wrong-headed. It seems like shel gets that?

reconciliation would be nice. although this person is a complete stranger to me, so it would really just be "conciliation"?? extremely weird

i guess to loop this back to the previous post: do i know shel gets that? if they don't, then i'm reaching out to someone who is happy to bite my hand in response. and that is kind of a lot painful. and also sometimes it reminds the person i exist and prompts them to start causing a fuss about me anew.

this has happened before

all good points; I agree that the situation is weird and uncertain and letting it lie might be awkward but optimal

I do think that "reconciliation" is an okay word for the context, because it's ultimately about mending relationships, and it's probably worthwhile to give parasocial relationships equal weight when harm was done that needs mending

This also reminds me of that whole "luneko" cryptocurrency thing, where some blockchain fuckers decided to co-opt lunekos under the Creative Commons license and then that led everyone who wanted a reason to hate you and Ash to use this as proof that you were hypocrites for supporting a cryptocurrency, and of course your public declarations otherwise just led to "of course, when you have your hand caught in the cookie jar."

People believe what they want to believe even when it makes no fucking sense.

there's a recurring thing i don't have a name for...

where someone proposes an explanation for an event that seems related enough to be plausible, but if you spell out what's supposed to have happened forwards, it's complete nonsense

like people see "ah! lunekos, those are ash's, therefore ash made this coin"

but the full story that's trying to depict is:

  1. we made a coin despite being vocally opposed to cryptocurrency
  2. we decided to put our own highly recognizable characters on it
  3. we did not mention it to anyone, despite that the entire grift is to convince people to buy it so it's worth something
  4. we did not expect anyone to figure out it was us

like. what? what kind of a plan is that

even though these accusations came from kiwi farms, everyone should completely believe them because of how serious they are

This "logic" continues to be garbage and that is disappointing as hell.

I have a zero tolerance policy on this shit, there is literally no point, ever, where you "gotta hand it to" fucking kf.

I honestly think shit like that is how they have continued to survive: because plenty of people are happy to be useful idiots for these nazi fucks if the latest slander is juicy enough.

"But what if it's true?" It's not. It never fucking is. You are letting people destroy human lives.

With a community with as bad of a reputation as Kiwi Farms I don't know how anyone using their brain could take them seriously

Well, okay, I do; it's because they WANT to see the drama, I guess. I guess this is an autism thing because I don't know how anyone finds that sort of thing entertaining, even if you completely ignore the moral dubiousness