lexyeevee

troublesome fox girl

hello i like to make video games and stuff and also have a good time on the computer. look @ my pinned for some of the video games and things. sometimes i am horny on @squishfox


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @lexyeevee's post:

i got this down to 5 lights before deciding it was dark enough for me.

do you even know if this is solveable? wait do you solve these by turning all the lights off or on. wait can you mathematically prove that any configuration of “chaos lights out” that’s solvable for all lights off is also always solvable for all lights on?

if it's "solvable to all lights off for any starting configuration", then solving to all lights off and repeating the solve path for "all lights on -> all lights off" gets you a solution for all lights on for any starting configuration

if it's "solvable to all lights off for some starting configuration", then no, even if you restrict yourself to:

  • every light affects itself
  • every light affects at most the 3x3 neighborhood centered on it

consider the 1x3 board where the lights affect (from left to right):

  • XX.
  • .XX
  • .XX

then you can solve, say, X.X to all lights off, but you can't solve it to all lights on

i remember how great i felt when i realized there was a reliable way to solve this puzzle. it made me feel like i had finally had some sort of clue on how to actually do it instead of aimlessly clicking everywhere and hoping i brute force my way into success.

you have taken this feeling away from me.