lexyeevee

troublesome fox girl

hello i like to make video games and stuff and also have a good time on the computer. look @ my pinned for some of the video games and things. sometimes i am horny on @squishfox


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @lexyeevee's post:

I've stopped following it myself for now, but haven't removed myself from places where other people are following it. This take from the dev of dsda-doom, and the reactions it's gotten, are encouraging.

As this is a spec put forth by a gpl launderer and organized by people with financial incentives, it's impossible for it to be a community effort or even to have an unbiased discussion about it. Half the people chiming in are earning a paycheck. Future discussion or iteration is hopelessly muddied now, as the financial ramifications of all the details of any spec will weigh into the minds of the people trying to drive the topic. I think it's a terrible precedent and the presentation of it like it's what's best for everyone and as if it had community input is complete sophistry. This appears to simply be an effort by a company poised to profit off of control of the standards to take that control and serve themselves. It's capitalism and the cashing in of decades of community clout. I'm sure everyone had the best intentions and there's nothing wrong with wanting to make a living, but if this is the future then I'll probably find another hobby.

yeah that was fucking blistering. i quote-replied to that a bit ago and just outright said bethesda should creative commons all the doom assets.

and then immediately got kinsie trying to tell me that R&R is the source code for what bethesda is putting out, jesus fuckin christ