cats & hobbies & art i make
avatar from sprites.pmdcollab.org


joewintergreen
@joewintergreen

i think the ai art thing is really about, people aren't comfortable with their own disinterest in things. they don't want to make art but they want to want to. they can't make themselves want to. but that's not ok with them. but they imagine it would feel good to have made art


blazehedgehog
@blazehedgehog

I think the foundation of "artists are elitists for gatekeeping art" is just a smoke screen by actual nefarious people who are using this technology for its true purpose, which is to flood the world with middling, cheap labor. But capitalist globalization is another topic entirely.

There is one "valid" target for this kind of stuff, and it's not just people who have been tricked into thinking they should be generating art (aka "product" or "content"). This comes from my own twitter thread, but I think it's kind of people like me. People who developed some amount of artistic skill through decades of constant practice, but never reached the place they were aiming to get to.

A drawing I did of a supposedly Tetsuya Nomura styled Link, of Legend of Zelda fame. Link is wearing a military drab trench coat covered in pockets. Hits pants have zippers that turn them into shorts of varying lengths. The Master Sword is partially a cutlass. His iconic hat is striped, and features a visor.

I came up during the rise of the anime boom and my skills at proportions never got good enough to draw like that. But I desperately wanted to. Around the mid-to-late 2000's I ended up entering several art contests, and got snubbed so badly I didn't even make it into the honorable mentions. I had worked so hard on those entries that I injured my hands with RSI, and it eventually developed in to slowly worsening carpal tunnel syndrome. I was so frustrated with what happened (on top of developing new creative interests) I basically gave up drawing entirely for many years. Almost any time I'd try, it would result in a barely-coherent sketch that made me too upset to finish.

Eventually, at some point, I realized this was stupid. I needed to force myself to try again. So I came up with little ways to get me drawing again, under the mantra that it didn't really matter if it was good, as long as it was finished. I couldn't let my talents go to waste. So I started doing artwork for my Youtube videos. Whether it was traditional pencil-drawn art that was colored digitally...

Artwork from my 'How DO We Fix Sonic?' video. Sonic is carrying two giant golden rings, one in each hand, and receiving a special score bonus. It is superimposed on notebook paper.

Or turned into pixel art...

Pixel art from my Sonic Mania video review. A Sonic fan talks an unwilling participant's ear off about tiny details, and the other person has a thousand yard stare at being subjected to this nonsense.

Now I've looped back around and reached a kind of understanding and acceptance of my artistic ability (including my limits). I've even occasionally started drawing for fun again. But there was a large window of time where I was deeply unhappy with where I was artistically, and felt like I'd never finish climbing that mountain (because that's the wrong way to look at art, for one).

And I can see a lot of real would-be artists, people who feel inadequate about their talent, who think it's slipping through their fingers like it was for me, look at this AI art stuff and think: "Finally, my shortcut. I've been studying art for ten years, but I don't need to spend the rest of my life working and failing at it. I'm savvy enough that I can just have the machine fill in my blanks."

It's still that crisis of identity, and perhaps an even worse one: because these aren't people being fooled into doing something they're not good at, they're being fooled into giving up. That this technology can "fix" them.

It can't. You can only fix yourself. How you view yourself, and your work, and how much you value what you produce. All this tech does is flood art channels with muddy sewage until you can't see anything anymore. You are hurting yourself and the entire artistic community.


lillipup
@lillipup

i feel like non artists view art really weirdly for some reason .. like its so widespread? ive met so many people in my life who "want" to draw but see no value in learning and they just settle on the opinion that the universe gave me a secret special power that they cant have bc theyre not the chosen one. maybe im forgetting or just unaware. but i really dont think ive seen ppl do this with other interests? like theres this OBSESSION with creating art omg i Wish i could draw!!! what do u mean i could learn. fuck off thats not worth my time. omg i wishhh i could drawwww. ive had people get angry at me for just having a skill bc i "get to draw" like theyre not allowed. like its my fault they dont wanna practice


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @joewintergreen's post:

Feels like they want the praise of making Art, because being a capital A Artist has some sort of value, but they don't want to like... "waste their time on it" being bad/getting better/or the "want to want to". They want the praise with none of the effort.

At least that's how some of the over-defensiveness/calling artists Elitists scans to me. They see Artists being put on a pedestal of some sort, the praise, the Engagement on social media, and they want it, but don't want to give up the hobbies they actually care about.

Honestly, after reading this I think I get it. I too have ideas I'd like to see made actual art in the world; I don't want to draw them, I've tried to learn how to draw before and it's just not my thing, but I want to have drawn them. It also must be really cool to have people liking your art.
But, of course, if you don't enjoy the process it's pointless to go through all the work, but instead of coming to peace with that part of yourself and save money to commission the ideas you can't get rid off, "AI art" has the appearance of being the cheap/free no effort solution to this dilemma.
I just want to take their hands and tell them that it's okay to do shitty art for fun, if the idea of getting good at it is too daunting. And that it's okay to recognize our time is finite and to enjoy other things you actually want to do.

[Cooper watches you walk away] "Joe's path is a strange and difficult one..." - and I agree 1000% with your thoughts here.

I think part of this is about accepting the finiteness of the self. I am almost certainly well more than halfway through my time on this planet. There are a lot of things I wished I could have done, things I could have learned. And I will manage to do some of them, hopefully the ones that I feel would most fulfill and enrich me as a human being. But the stuff I don't get around to, I can't get too sad about. That's a nearly infinite reservoir of possible regret, and unlike so many of the regrets fate saddles us with, these you can usually simply opt out of.

And it's certainly not worth pretending that I did actually get around to those things, when I didn't. That would be like lying that I speak a language or play some instrument that I can't really... to, what? Impress someone at a party? I want them to be impressed with (well, I'd settle for just "like" / "tolerate") the person I actually am, not some fabrication.

So I think AI generators are mostly things that help you pretend, pretty unconvincingly, that you are infinite, did everything, knew everything. But the beauty of a life is in its finiteness, its specificities, its utterly unique rainbow scribble across time and space.

I wish I enjoyed drawing, but I don't. It sucks every time and it never becomes fun or easy. But I do have ideas I want other people to see. So I pay artists to draw for me. Its ethical and surprisingly affordable.

But I totally get it, I get why someone would say "I don't care about the process, I just want to be seen". I wish 'AI art' wasn't built on an ethics nightmare or else I'd probably support it just for that one use case.

i mean im not gonna lie. i wouldn't make text-to-image model art, because on the important hand there seems to be no ethical implementation of it and on the less important hand it gives me headaches, but like. i'm not very good at art and i don't have the energy to make art. i have plenty of ideas- but not enough money to pay people to articulate them as often as i'd like, not enough skill to begin the work of portraying them nearly as well as i'd like, and not enough energy to gain the skill. i DO want a shortcut, i suppose, because i'm not making art for the sake of finishing a piece (if i even finish a piece!) and going "damn, that's not nearly as good as i wanted it to be"

i really hate playing devils advocate, but for people with a similar dynamic to art like me, i can understand occasionally getting lulled with the siren song of easy art. i dont want to be an artist, i'd say i already am one, even if i'm bad at it. and yet im so very frequently frustrated with my art for it not coming out the way i want. that doesnt justify utilizing AI art, let alone claiming that youre an artist for doing so, but i can see the appeal of that shortcut. i want to bring the ideas i have in my head out onto the page, and the idea art isnt for me has genuinely haunted me for years. i want to want to make art, but i constantly feel roadblocked and incapable of doing so.

i'm still going to keep trying, and no shortcut is worth the harm of AI art, but that doesn't really change my frustration

I've regularly felt the frustration of the images in my head not translating to the page, because I'm just not a details-oriented thinker and visualize more in the broad strokes

though using AI does not appeal to me in that way at all. even if it was something theoretically capable of directly copying what is in my brain to the canvas, the process by which one physically makes something (and not the thing that comes out of the other end) is the actual art, so skipping that is removing the part where you yourself interface with life

even if I never climb the mountain, being instantly taken to the peak would not convey the feeling of having gotten there

i remember once when i was pretty young, realising all at once after some frustration trying to draw, that the picture in my head can literally never happen no matter how good i get, that that's literally impossible, and the art is whatever actually comes out when i try.

the things people praise and enjoy in art will at least half the time be things the author didn't consciously intend, but which could only have come from that author.

that realisation for me completely evaporates that type of frustration. it's been a fundamental truth to me now for long enough that i just never experience that type of frustration anymore. i make things, and they aren't what i imagined, and that's the whole point.

This is incredibly insightful, but I think it's missing that the majority of people that I have the displeasure of seeing don't really think that much beyond they want something to masturbate to. Like really. There's so many people that really just want an infinite masturbation machine. It's sad and a little terrifying. I feel like most breakdowns of the AI art thing don't take into account there's a uncomfortably massive chunk of people that don't give a shit about ethics or anything other than a nihilistic self-pleasure.

I think there's a lot of people who think that just having a good idea makes them something special or unique somehow.
The challenge of making something is a huge barrier to them, denying them their RIGHT to their amazing idea - and AI represents a way where only having an idea is enough for them to make something reality. No real work required!

How many times have you heard someone say "I had that idea first" as if they should be credited with simply thinking about it.

yeah, this doesn't happen as much now, but i used to always hear people be worried about people stealing their ideas, so they wouldn't share them. which is obvs ridiculous - nobody will ever make what you imagined, even you; everyone's version of your idea can coexist

i have a .txt file somewhere from when i was 19 where i wrote out, and forgot about, my idea for a video game called "raft" and it was exactly the video game that now exists called "raft" that someone else has now unrelatedly made. how could i be mad

in reply to @blazehedgehog's post:

on the whole bit on "I think the foundation of "artists are elitists for gatekeeping art" is just a smoke screen by actual nefarious people who are using this technology for its true purpose, which is to flood the world with middling, cheap labor. But capitalist globalization is another topic entirely."

I'd agree if this last 10 years or so wasn't full of discourse about gatekeeping and how its bad and how people are bad for doing it and etc.

Things don't need to be a "meanwhile at the fortress of evil" Capitalist boogeyman plot. It can just be a bunch of stupid people, doing stupid people things, and you just happen to be on the other side of the, "how dare you stop people from participating in the thing" for once.

Occam's Razor, man.

Occam's razor says the people at the top of the ladder want the cheapest, fastest labor they can get, spread across the widest audience they have, in order to reap the maximum financial benefits. They will sell lies, tear down safety and bulldoze any barriers needed to achieve that goal. Not the first time that has happened (and definitely not the last).

Getting too complacent with "it's fine, they're just stupid" is how we ended up a bankrupt casino dude in the President's Chair.

Be smart and always be on guard. Never an inch.

huh, the definition for Occam's razor is way different than I remember it being.

on the whole political part, I don't want to bring massive political arguments onto Cohost, I've been having a good time so far. So I'll just wrap it up with saying,

'aight.

And I am not (or was not, I dunno) normally politically motivated. I did not used to care. But after that particular stretch of four or five years, I feel like that was a mistake, and we all need to be at least a little more aware. It's not black and white; there's a gradient before you hit full-blown tinfoil hat.

You do you, but I'm keeping up my guard.

i think both of these posts are overanalyzing something that's fundamentally very simple. someone wants to depict an idea they have in their head. learning to draw well enough to execute it takes multiple years. using an AI generative model doesn't. (not to say that there isn't skill involved, but making this character portrait with my local copy of stable diffusion took me far less of a skill investment than it would take to draw it.)

like, i saw a photo of a tiny figure of someone's FFXIV character. they didn't make the model themselves, it's just ripped assets from the game. they didn't hand-sculpt it, it was 3d printed. but at the end of the day, they can look at their figure and go "that's my blorbo :)". similarly, i take screenshots of my own character in outfits using models other people made (that are sometimes ripped from other games!), using a rendering engine i didn't write, with shaders that someone else coded. is that "art"? am i an "artist"? i don't care. it makes me happy, so i do it. if i could get the same results by typing "my ffxiv character, smiling, in [description of her outfit], drinking tea" into stable diffusion, i would, because i care about the end result of seeing her in various poses more than i care about the process itself.

Pinned Tags