Here are my two best from mid-May. The first two photos are taken on a 10 MP Canon that's probably 10+ years old. 8 sec. ISO 400 for the first image, which is noticeably brighter than it was in-person. 8 sec. ISO 80 for the second image, which is pretty close to the brightness I remember in-person. And yes, that is not a photo artifact, looking west at one point there was a sharp line where the aurora "ended", as if it was a ray of light. Pretty wild!
The next (pre-aurora night landscape) was taken on my phone.
All images are obviously heavily processed for noise, and while I could have done better if I had thought about taking multiple shorter exposures, it also makes me want to get a camera with better low light performance.