lunarfox22

a little fox typing on a keyboard

30 | I just wanna draw comics. Unfortunately I must live in a context.



dog
@dog

If I were launching a new subscription-based games media site I'd have launched it with articles worth paying for first but that's just me


dog
@dog

At some point I looked at what their articles were in their first couple days, and it was, like

  • Six articles about AAA games
  • Four articles about twitter
  • Several articles about media, inc. the Zelda movie
  • Zero articles about indie games, or any game with a budget below $50 million

Didn't really feel like a bold new direction for independent media, just same old same old


nex3
@nex3

specifically: "if we do the exact same thing maybe we can get bought out by horrible media conglomerates too!"


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @dog's post:

A new independent gaming site launched recently, with some ex-staffers from a different site. They're intended to be, you know - what only independent media can cover, etc. But what I've seen on them so far feels just more of the same, just with a subscription this time.

I didn't bother mentioning the name because I figure I'm already just being bitchy about it, no reason to toss that into their google results.

I dunno when you checked but I’ve seen a few about, specifically, indie games (well, one is a fangame based on a AAA property, but I feel like that still counts) over the past few days fwiw

Paywalling the site isn't inherently a bad thing, imo - Defector and 404 are both doing it as a way to avoid dependence on ads and have some more stability. But I think you need a higher caliber of writing to support that, and at least what I read in the first couple days of the site wasn't there

one of the reasons that comes to mind to start a site like that would be to attract the attention of PR people at companies and to get press releases and stuff, but even then it is kinda bleak

It's frustrating when a new site like this launches and the initial wave of articles isn't that great, because now I've hit my article limit and can't even see if they're writing stuff I'd want to support

in reply to @nex3's post:

I get the impression from the people who launched it that they're aiming for something sustainable; I don't think it's as cynical as that. But the content of what they launched with doesn't feel like it matches those goals