lunemercove

witchy girl/virtual snep

^ computer witch ^
^ self-taught 3D modeller ^
^ 🏳️‍⚧️, fan of girls ^
^ old enough ^
^ anarchist 🟥⬛^


see them uncombined here


you can always find me here
lune.gay/
the blog specifically
lune.gay/blog/

it's hard for me to join in on the "computers suck I'm moving to the woods" style of burnt-out programmer even if I understand that's not (always) meant literally, because there's so much cool stuff you can do with computers. running my own corner of online, running my own computers, finding the willpower to put in the time to learn 3D modelling so I can have my own vtubing model even, all of that is very important to me. core to me, at this point, in a lot of ways.

I hate that I feel like I have to constantly nurture this personal side of computing, actively maintain it even, because I too am just being worn down and burnt out by the way the rest of the industry is. the way the big companies are, the way the people who lead them are, the way (unfortunately) too many programmers are. the slack GPT news bums me out because I assume we're going to get it and three of my coworkers are going to go "wow this is so cool, I can ask the computer a question and it'll throw words at me in a way that vaguely approximates a thought-out answer". and I guess I'll just have to ignore that, or maybe politely nod in a meeting if it comes up then.

I wish we could get the cool stuff without all of the absolute shit as a side effect, within the industry and outside (and as a consequence of) the industry. I wish I didn't feel embarrassed, constantly, about what I do for a living and what is basically the only thing I'm qualified to do professionally.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @lunemercove's post:

On the AI stuff, my boss (professional researcher) is enamored by it. He's old enough that newer tools like python kinda passed him by, always having underlings to do the scripting where he was more of a director role (which is fine, that's what he's supposed to do). Recently, he started using chat-gpt to start writing python scripts... and it works... just extremely unoptimized mess that I can find examples online showing nearly the exact same code that anyone could copy if they had googled their question instead of asking chat-gpt to do it... But anyway, it's annoying because he thinks that it can replace a week's worth of optimizing and bug fixing with asking chat-gpt for code on how to do whatever analysis we're doing that week and I'm just sitting there like, "no, it's not quite that easy" when this gets suggested every time. Because yeah, sure, it'll produce code that mostly works, but it'll have unforeseen bugs, be unoptimized, and more importantly, not actually understand what it does.

I too am annoyed at these silicate sparky boxes I guess.