lupi

cow of tailed snake (gay)

avatar by @citriccenobite

you can say "chimoora" instead of "cow of tailed snake" if you want. its a good pun.​


i ramble about aerospace sometimes
I take rocket photos and you can see them @aWildLupi


I have a terminal case of bovine pungiform encephalopathy, the bovine puns are cowmpulsory


they/them/moo where "moo" stands in for "you" or where it's funny, like "how are moo today, Lupi?" or "dancing with mooself"



Bovigender (click flag for more info!)
bovigender pride flag, by @arina-artemis (click for more info)



Loosf
@Loosf

Ah

Adult content won't have reach Fucking bullshit

Adult or queer content will be deboosted on the algorithm

They really have not liked that queer people have infiltrated their little techbro Twitter 2.0

Again they just activated blocks because trans people screamed at matt yglesias

And they can't have that Queers and pornographers and sex workers are not their target demographic


eramdam
@eramdam

Not because I want to play Devil's Advocate or whatever, but more because I think it's valuable to know what we're criticizing to do it effectively. Some kind of "know your enemy" type thing.

From the devs own admission, the "What's Hot" feed (which is another tab in the app) i a huge hack right now (for a few days after I joined anything that got 8+ likes would get on there, it seems the minimum is at 12), mostly as a placeholder because the whole "value" "proposition" of Bluesky is that users/clients(app) would be able to build and offer algorithms. Like, there's already a third-party app for iOS that lets you see a "Mutuals" feed, and another web-based thing that offers alternatives as well so you can imagine almost anything going from there1

So while the statement is true that "adult content"2 is hidden, it is only in the "What's Hot" feed. Which for now is the only "algorithm-based"3 feed, but Bluesky's pitch is that you will be able to choose whatever you want in a "marketplace of algorithms"4 so if that shit takes off you as a user and poster/creator won't have an algorithm to point (or worry about I guess) to but multiples, probably as many as there are users depending on implementations, idk.

EDIT: oops I fucked the footnotes up, oops oops, should be good now


  1. disclaimer: I barely played with the API but the fact that these "custom algorithms" came out in a matter of days after the big invite explosions from last week speaks to the ease of implementation of these so I'm sure we will see A LOT of different ways to visualize one's feed, which I think is actually cool on paper.

  2. the guy (why.bsky.team) said in another post that they're using/experimenting with https://thehive.ai/ to classify content so you can imagine how that's gonna go. I /think/ there's also manual classification, but don't quote me on that.

  3. the whole "algorithm" conversation makes me sad because, like, reverse chronological feeds are algorithm-based, it's just that "Algorithm" became an umbrella term for "stuff that decides what content you see for you instead of respecting what you chose".

  4. I have no clue if this is supposed to be a literal marketplace or if it's just a way to say "everybody could offer algorithms"


erica
@erica

this is a good explanation of this (other) dumb bluesky thing both in the 'i probably won't have to worry about this' sense but also in the 'reinforces how dumb all of bluesky is' sense


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @Loosf's post:

this is a known problem with "what's hot" style features

the stuff that the largest number of people want to see is, yeah, largely porn

people who started things that aren't even social networks have written about it at great length

we would have thought the obvious solution is not to have "what's hot" at all because it will necessarily perpetuate injustice and all that

but of course it Drives Engagement™, so anyone attempting to profit off their thing will default to including it........................

in reply to @eramdam's post:

If the warnings ive seen on Bluesky are any indication it seems to work okay enough? I'd argue that maybe tagging the picture of a dude in bathing suit in a swimming pool as "sexually suggestive" is kinda weird but what do I know.

i'm sure it's fine at detecting nudity but i don't even remotely trust whatever value system it's operating on, nor do i trust its capabilities around text moderation (what they were trying to sell to us for)