This post contains 18+ content. You can view it if you're over 18.
This post has content warnings for: Discussions of snuff and rape fantasies, Religious trauma and slut-shaming.
This page's posts are visible only to users who are logged in.
loves to -atic your problems
- xe/xir + it/its [NO THEY]
30+ ★ queer [&] neurodiverse
nonwhite ★ clinically disastrous ★ purveyor of too much media ★ govt assigned cagab is information you're not entitled to
account made 15/02/'24
You must log in to comment.
in reply to @AshenveinGate's post:
You give me a lot to think about. I agree with the general principle, and I do agree that immoral fiction can be so much more interesting than bland moral fiction. I will say this: I do think fiction is a way to understand reality, but that doesn't mean I think fiction should necessarily have a moral component.
I completely agree! I think it's a valid artistic choice to use moral components, but the common belief that authors must use them, and if we don't we're failing the cause du jour, is stifling, frustrating and often actively dangerous
