it's honestly crazy to me how good the pentax q's are and I can't help but feel like it's sad that they weren't successful (even if there's no way they would have been)
They literally have a scaled down version of every feature of a pentax dslr [minus viewfinder of course]
im very disappointed in my vintage photography self for seeing pentax and thinking "...tampons?"
does that include the k1's AA filter because that thing annoyed me so much I got a ks2 instead (which is also a perfect camera)
I don't know about that, is it a virtual AA filter type thing on the K1 (like, no AA filter on sensor, but option to vibrate the sensor to simulate it)?
I'm pretty sure the q's all have no AA filter, but also no option for simulated filter for some reason even though they do have the hardware for it theoretically (piezo vibration dust reduction thing + sensor shift stabilization). Maybe they didn't do it because it would be hard to get right at a tiny scale?
yeah the K1's filter is simulated using the anti-shake functions pathway
Ok well in that case "it's not like that" because I think it just doesn't have any AA filter dfsjkl
