Maybe I'm imagining it and it's literally the same* but I feel like I always get better results out of cameras that have A<-> B G<->M white balance fine tuning instead of +/-R +/-B...
* i mean I know it is literally theoretically accomplishing the same thing, but changing which axes the fine tuning grid is based on seems to make a difference -
I think it's because while those two types of grid do literally accomplish the same thing, in terms of how I relate to the world/how scenes Feel to me - amber is a nicer feeling warm tint than red, and how green vs magenta the color is can emphasize how other colors in the scene contrast or blend with that - so having amber + magenta vs green be on the horizontal axes instead of sort of offset at an angle in the positive/negative R / B type grid makes it easier to get fine tuning that relates to + emphasizes how scenes feel, physically, to me.
Does tha tmake any sense at all
also I still think CTE white balance is OP in some situations and the weird uh hexagon image + color fine tuning thing some pentax cameras have is at least cool if not actually doing anything useful. I think it is tho
