Micolithe
Agender
36 years old
Philadelphia, PA
Online Now
Last Login: 08/30/2007

Agender Enby, Trans, Gay, AND the bearer of the gamer's curse. Not a man, not a woman, but instead I am puppy.
I got a fat ass and big ears.

--

Yes I did the cooking mama Let's Play way back when. I post alot about Tech (mostly how it sucks) and Cooking and Music and Television Shows and the occasional Let's Play video
💖@FadeToZac

--

We all do what we can ♫

So we can do just one more thing ♫

We can all be free ♫

Maybe not in words ♫

Maybe not with a look ♫

But with your mind ♫


last.fm listening



shel
@shel

I truly fail to understand why aloof and uncaring is what mainstream culture seems to see as "cool." Like so many people always trying to come off like nothing matters to them. Oh, sure, they're here, but they're not like, invested in it. Wouldn't matter to them one way or the other. I truly don't understand performing that. It just seems boring and depressing to me. Isn't it so much better to be invested in things? To feel all of life? To fully participate in the world around you?


micolithe
@micolithe

I think this is a big part of why as a cynical 18 year old I really didn't feel like I was living life. I was miserable. I was trying so hard to detach myself from the world around me because in alot of ways I was only seeing negatives. 2005 wasn't great by any means but there was alot of good stuff I could have enjoyed too and I just chose not to because society had told me that's what it meant to be cool.

Anyway society is wrong about alotta stuff, turns out.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @shel's post:

Maybe it's a reflection of how our society supports maintaining the status quo? If you're detached, that means you don't care about how things are, so you are unlikely to threaten the status quo, so elevating your social class helps perpetuate that status quo

I always interpreted "cool" to be short for "too cool for blank", it's not that the person doesn't care, it's that they care about things so far beyond mundane everyday stuff that you can only wonder what those things are like. I do think that, as an affectation, this aspect of it was lost at some point, as higher and higher levels of "cool" were attempted, leading to more and more esoteric interests, and of course the phenomenon of ironically liking things basically acting as a prestige level where you can start over at the beginning without losing progress, and then it turns out there can be multiple layers of such, and the whole concept succumbs to irony poisoning, and the rest of us are kinda just like "what the fuck are you all doing over there?"

my (fittingly, somewhat detached and cynical) take on the popularity of "cool, detached, cynical" outlooks in the mainstream i think is at some level connected to the capitalist... uh... societal death drive? Or something like that?

I'm picking my words carefully here because I think this is a level of Philosophy that i am not particularly well-read-up on, but basically like: A capitalist society does not have a way to cope with the sort of crises that are now facing our society (climate change most primarily, but everything else that comes off of that as well: disease, collapse of the social functions of cities, more people living worse lives because of homelessness, lack of healthcare, etc etc) so instead of training people to SEE more and to OPEN UP the soft hand of capitalism instead trains people to detach, to individualize, to look away.

So of course it would follow then that the celebrities (& the popular trends) of such a culture would reflect that. it's not cool to care, because that means you have to feel emotional pain when things are going bad, which they are, often. the flipside of this is that it naturally breeds "aloofness" as a survival trait for people who are just trying to get by without feeling like they're completely overwhelmed by the world in general.

I mean like almost everything else, it is one of those things where I'm like "ok so the cure here is to talk to people and get involved with your communities more" but AS WE KNOW, that is also extremely difficult in a society that has made "connecting with your communities" often quite difficult, etc etc. Anyway that's my overwrought theory on it

My take on it would be that being able to meaningfully be "above" it all means that you have power. If you care, then you have stakes, a lever that someone else can grab on to and threaten you with. If you get to choose to be aloof of most concerns, then that's power you haven't given to others. Power, and the proxies of status and wealth, have an effect on how people see you.

Now, granted, actually being able to pull this off is way different from trying to pull it off.

Mind, I don't think this is any way to live, but I have a feeling this is some of the root?

Granted, in my case, I'm good enough at the things I'm a nerd about to be impressive to other nerds, and to non-nerds, so I don't feel a need to try to project status, so my understanding here isn't super deep, but I think that's a part of it.

people who are interested and curious and delighted and invested are always, for some reason, depicted as also being naïve and gullible and overly trusting. would love to see a more accurate portrayal of this kind of person: they aren't having So Much Fun because they are new, they are just like that. and they have seen your bullshit before. bad actors stand no chance

in reply to @micolithe's post: