Ligatures are disabled, and yet it still converts => into ⇒
Which is neat if that's what you're after, but for me I like to see what the characters actually are, not what they imply.
- they/them
- youtube.com/c/MicolitheSA
| Micolithe |
|---|
| Agender |
| 36 years old |
| Philadelphia, PA |
 |
| Last Login: 08/30/2007 |
Agender Enby, Trans, Gay, AND the bearer of the gamer's curse. Not a man, not a woman, but instead I am puppy.
I got a fat ass and big ears.
--
Yes I did the cooking mama Let's Play way back when. I post alot about Tech (mostly how it sucks) and Cooking and Music and Television Shows and the occasional Let's Play video
💖@FadeToZac
--
We all do what we can ♫
So we can do just one more thing ♫
We can all be free ♫
Maybe not in words ♫
Maybe not with a look ♫
But with your mind ♫
Youtube
youtube.com/user/MicolitheSATwitch
twitch.tv/micolitheYou must log in to comment.
in reply to @micolithe's post:
a) how dare you. ligatures are love, ligatures are life
b) no clue about mobaxterm, but most fonts offer a version without ligatures, and if not you can remove them yourself with fontforge
also this is probably not the case but just in case: did you type the ⇒ in the terminal or is that possibly an actual ⇒ unicode character lol
I typed it to test that the checkbox took effect (it did not)
Oringally I found it in a python script I was looking at w/ vim, it displays the ligature until I highlight one of the two characters at which point it splits it.
it may be you're running a vim or shell plugin that's doing the ligatures, I know there's one for vim
It's a personal preference thing, gimme that raw unconverted text
I wish you well in your ligature enjoyment.
they've bitten me a few times coding, so im using them but it's a trust but verify kinda situation