mrhands

Sexy game(s) maker

  • he/him

I do UI programming for AAA games and I have opinions about adult games


Discord
mrhands31

pendell
@pendell

I think it says a lot that we all just expect everything on the internet to be free. YouTube doing all this stuff to try and crack down on adblockers - yeah, we know it won't increase their revenue in any way, but can you really blame them for trying? I think it's probably not unfair to say YouTube is the most expensive website on the planet to run in terms of how much bandwidth they have to serve the entire globe.

Now, yes, Google can probably run YouTube for all eternity and keep it alive via their profits from everything else they do, but I mean, if we did not specifically have Google essentially sinking their infinite money into YouTube just because it's got a captive audience, it would basically Not Exist. The only truly sustainable, economical way to video hosting and streaming really is to paywall it, whether it be paid access for viewers or charging people to upload. So, basically, the Vimeo model.

And then we can talk about how capitalism shouldnt be making these kinds of things effectively impossible unless you're an international multibillion dollar tech firm but that's a whole other conversation. At a certain point the internet just can't be Free anymore. Shit costs money.

Anyways subscribe to Cohost Plus.


micolithe
@micolithe

Speaking of shit costs money: YouTube forcibly demonetized my channel several years ago because it's not popular enough, the street goes both ways, if they make it harder for someone to get their foot in the door financially why should I respect their demands for me to view ads?


REP-Resent
@REP-Resent

It feels sort of like I'm on crazy pills, because while simultaneously there's a discussion about they have to make money somehow, there's a complete loss of grasp on the Tech Bubble's key point of surface tension.

You can't grow forever, you can't speculate forever, you can't do any of this 'move fast break things' mentality without a critical eye on what the end of the line looks at and get away with it for long. In an unprecedented time of information technology capabilities and expansion of capacity, there was never much thought given to sustainability; more-over, few informed observers nearest to the decision makers seemed capable of considering what the failure of this infrastructure would mean.

In it's own humorous manner, the impossible figures of finance that are at the center of Alphabet's attitudes towards all of their enterprises reflect the mentality of the top performers in big business. Everything, literally everything, is pushed onto the consumer at a time when virtually all audience members are experiencing a financial squeeze.

If Google truly is looking at insane losses of ad revenue in the double digit percentage, it makes you wonder how much they're gambling on AI technology when their approach to Youtube is about as half-assed and ineffectual as ever.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @pendell's post:

look at the threads about the poor quality of open source, people's expectations of baseline have been shifted to require the result of millions of investment for single person open source applications. and yeah some can compete, but not at scale.

but like, also, it means a handspun local volunteer org website looks much worse than what people expect from an Organization. so they move to Facebook groups

data and advertising are the way free has always been funded, from the store loyalty cards that give you discounts in exchange for knowing your shopping habits, to advertiser-driven television and news and radio

but every generation that gets a useful education, advertising loses more and more value, and scale goes up.

I'm not sure subscriptions are a solution either, because a lot of subscription money comes from people forgetting it's enabled -- that's why everyone switched to a subscribe model, but it's the best option cohost has

I payed a subscription for about eighteen months after I tried to cancel it. I knew it was still running but I didn’t feel like sending the emails etc. required to cancel it (and it was going to a creator so I didn’t begrudge them the “extra” money).

But yeah.

it's so infuriating on the handspun local volunteer org site because for some reason "we" collectively decided that any page refresh meant you should be punished with life in prison apparently, so completely static websites are React-based for ??????? reasons half the time

BOOTSTRAP WAS GREAT. IT WAS A BASIC LEVEL OF UI NICENESS THAT WORKED. AND THEN PEOPLE STARTED SHITTING ON IT BECAUSE "WAH IT ALL LOOKS THE SAME" AND THEREFORE MOVED TO THE COMPLETELY THE SAME PAGES ON FUCKING FACEBOOK

you're right, why learn css when you could instead learn css properties, then just write them as shorthand on every single element, i too love being paid by the character

On the other hand, Google basically did this to themselves. They crushed every potential threat to their profits by "generously" making everything free, wiping out the Internet's institutional memory of paying for services that we relied on. And they think that they're so indispensable and/or have built up enough good will that they can cry poverty and pass the hat...