mya

Entirely Normal Girl

šŸ–¼ļø header by cloud_data00 on twitter, icon by flyplague on twitter

last.fm listening

"Mya is some sort of collective mania." - Ɓlvaro Barredo


pastellexists
@pastellexists

i prefer to distinguish between live creatures and creatures that have been made into food, so a fish that is for eating is moku kala, and as such, moku kala palisa is a fish stick.

this is because i generally hold the function over the form, and in increasing degrees of specificity. at least when it comes to physical objects.

if someone said "bring me food," then lentil soup, glazed salmon, or fish sticks would all be an appropriate thing to bring them. if someone said "bring me food that is made out of fish," then only glazed salmon or fish sticks would be appropriate. and then if someone said "bring me food that is made out of fish in the shape of a stick," then only fish sticks would be appropriate.

also, fish sticks are not really interchangeable with any other kind of stick. they are not sticks for any real purpose. if someone said "quick, i need a stick!" then bringing them a fish stick would almost certainly not satisfy whatever need they have.


pastellexists
@pastellexists
This post contains 18+ content. You can view it if you're over 18.
log in

You must log in to comment.

in reply to @mya's post:

if you refer to it as "fish" it makes more sense than with "stick". i would think you have a stroke if you asked me if i have sticks in my fridge, but id give you fish sticks if you asked me for fish. so it is fundamentally a fish

that's fair though i would say 'moku kala palisa' is about as accurate? i mostly picked the order i did cuz it sounded phonemically better to me, but like i feel like in most contexts referring to them as a kind of palisa would be a little weird, and they are definitely something Of fish and not a kind of kala

in reply to @pastellexists's post: